This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2017-10-25 SGB Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2017-MM-DD Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
Calvin Beebe | |||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Russ Hamm | |||
Tony Julian | |||
Paul Knapp | |||
Austin Kreisler | |||
Wayne Kubick | |||
Thom Kuhn | |||
Ken McCaslin | |||
Rik Smithies | |||
Sandy Stuart | |||
Quorum: Chair + 4 |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2017-10-18_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Review GOM with respect to where SGB and precepts should be reflected
- Recommend to TSC to work with CTO on architecture and tooling strategy to support the work of the committees in following the precepts
- Ask Vocab to approve a motion that it was the WG’s intention in R3 for the Expansion profile to be balloted as STU. If PA has not documented approval, send them the same message
- Paul to verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Discussion Topics
- Conversation with EST regarding precepts around adding new tools.
- Finish review of mixed ballot content precept
- Precept implementation strategy
- Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families
- Precepts to Develop:
- SGB to produce a precept requiring that, in order to publish a specification, it has to be conformant to any harmonization patterns that HL7 has published
- State Machine Alignment
- How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs
- Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature
- Engagement in large cross-organizational projects
- How management groups document, enforce, and manage the precepts regarding inter-WG participation in artifact creation
- Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change.
- The addition of new tools (with EST)
- Managing unresponsive parties in PSS approval process
- Vocabulary
- Training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles
- Vitality Assessment
- Parking Lot
- Review Publishing M&C updates regarding dual roles
- How do we deal with making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching? (CIMI and Pharmacy and Lab models)
- Review Mission and Charter
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ask methodology groups to define how the definition of substantive change applies to their product family; management groups must then operationalize
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved