This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "November 05, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 67: Line 67:
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 
* line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's.  (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
 
* line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's.  (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
 +
*[[Security| Meeting Information]]
 +
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]
 +
 +
==Attendees==
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present'''
 +
|-.
 +
| [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair ||x||
 +
|| [mailto:john.moehrke@med.ge.com John Moehrke] Security Co-chair ||
 +
|| || [mailto:trish.williams@ecu.edu.au Trish Williams] Security Co-chair ||
 +
|-
 +
| [mailto:bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de Bernd Blobel], Security Co-chair ||. || ||||.|| || ||.
 +
|-
 +
| [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] ||x
 +
||
 +
|| [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] ||x
 +
|| || [mailto:duane.decouteau@gmail.com Duane DeCouteau] ||
 +
|-
 +
|[mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer] ||
 +
|| ||[mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair ||x
 +
|| || [mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker] ||x
 +
|-
 +
| [mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Muhammed Jafari] ||
 +
|| || [mailto:djorgenson@inpriva.com Don Jorgenson] ||
 +
|| || [mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga] ||x
 +
|-
 +
| [mailto:Harry.Rhodes@AHIMA.org Harry Rhodes] ||
 +
|| || [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] ||
 +
|| || [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com David Staggs] ||
 +
|-
 +
| [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair ||
 +
|| || [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] ||x
 +
|| || [mailto:Scott.Weinstein@hhs.gov Scott Weinstein] ||
 +
|-
 +
| || || || . || || || . ||
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]
 +
 +
==Agenda==
 +
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
 +
# '''New Harmonization Proposal''' - Kathleen
 +
#''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 +
#''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments''' Security and Privacy Ontology
 +
#''(15 min)'' '''NIB submittal'''
 +
#''(10 min)'' '''Other Business'''
 +
 +
==Meeting Minutes==
 +
 +
 +
# '''New Harmonization Proposal''' - Kathleen
 +
(accepted by the review)
 +
* TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
 +
* TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
 +
** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
 +
***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO
 +
 +
What will it mean to support more than one value?
 +
 +
Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in
 +
 +
'' '''DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' ''
 +
 +
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 +
* line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's.  (No vote recorded, so no response ''required''), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
 +
* line 37 (comment 34) - not persuasive
 +
* comment 35 - not persuasive
 +
* comment 36 - not persuasive (handling caveats not complete)
 +
* line 37
 +
* line 38
 +
* line 39
 +
* line 40
 +
* line 41
 +
* line 42
 +
 +
 +
--end of Dr. Stumpf’s comments
 +
* line 45 – Clem
 +
 +
** concerned expressed on if the dispositions will allow for the passing of the ballot? <<yes>>
 +
 +
Dispositions on the comments for the
 +
Brian : Second
 +
Objections: none / Abstentions: none / Motion: Passes (5)
 +
 +
Remaining agenda
 +
 +
LOINC clinical background ontology … use of common terminology as required for … <<58:04>>

Revision as of 23:21, 5 November 2013

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Member Name Present Member Name Present Member Name Present
Mike Davis Security Co-chair x John Moehrke Security Co-chair Trish Williams Security Co-chair
Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair . . .
Johnathan Coleman x Kathleen Connor x Duane DeCouteau
Reed Gelzer Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair x Brian Handspicker x
Muhammed Jafari Don Jorgenson Diana Proud-Madruga x
Harry Rhodes Ioana Singureanu David Staggs
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair Tony Weida x Scott Weinstein
. .


Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
  3. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
  4. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments Security and Privacy Ontology
  5. (15 min) NIB submittal
  6. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

  1. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen

(accepted by the review)

  • TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
  • TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
    • Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
      • there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO

What will it mean to support more than one value?

Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in

DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION

Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments

  • line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
  • Meeting Information

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Member Name Present Member Name Present Member Name Present
Mike Davis Security Co-chair x John Moehrke Security Co-chair Trish Williams Security Co-chair
Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair . . .
Johnathan Coleman x Kathleen Connor x Duane DeCouteau
Reed Gelzer Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair x Brian Handspicker x
Muhammed Jafari Don Jorgenson Diana Proud-Madruga x
Harry Rhodes Ioana Singureanu David Staggs
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair Tony Weida x Scott Weinstein
. .


Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
  3. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
  4. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments Security and Privacy Ontology
  5. (15 min) NIB submittal
  6. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

  1. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen

(accepted by the review)

  • TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
  • TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
    • Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
      • there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO

What will it mean to support more than one value?

Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in

DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION

Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments

  • line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded, so no response required), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
  • line 37 (comment 34) - not persuasive
  • comment 35 - not persuasive
  • comment 36 - not persuasive (handling caveats not complete)
  • line 37
  • line 38
  • line 39
  • line 40
  • line 41
  • line 42


--end of Dr. Stumpf’s comments

  • line 45 – Clem
    • concerned expressed on if the dispositions will allow for the passing of the ballot? <<yes>>

Dispositions on the comments for the Brian : Second Objections: none / Abstentions: none / Motion: Passes (5)

Remaining agenda

LOINC clinical background ontology … use of common terminology as required for … <<58:04>>

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=November_05,_2013_Security_WG_Conference_Call&oldid=79947"