This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 05, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group) | ** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group) | ||
***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO | ***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO | ||
+ | |||
+ | What will it mean to support more than one value? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in | ||
'' '''DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' '' | '' '''DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' '' | ||
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments | '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments | ||
+ | * line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation |
Revision as of 22:32, 5 November 2013
Attendees
Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mike Davis Security Co-chair | x | John Moehrke Security Co-chair | Trish Williams Security Co-chair | ||||
Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair | . | . | . | ||||
Johnathan Coleman | x | Kathleen Connor | x | Duane DeCouteau | |||
Reed Gelzer | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair | x | Brian Handspicker | x | |||
Muhammed Jafari | Don Jorgenson | Diana Proud-Madruga | x | ||||
Harry Rhodes | Ioana Singureanu | David Staggs | |||||
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair | Tony Weida | x | Scott Weinstein | ||||
. | . |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments Security and Privacy Ontology
- (15 min) NIB submittal
- (10 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
- New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
(accepted by the review)
- TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
- TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
- Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
- there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO
- Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
What will it mean to support more than one value?
Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in
DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
- line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation