This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CMET Management by MnM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
***Verify that "new" publishing leaves CMET "primary" content in domain directories and builds the "Common" stuff by "including" these | ***Verify that "new" publishing leaves CMET "primary" content in domain directories and builds the "Common" stuff by "including" these | ||
*Revise and then Facilitate ANSI Registrations for releases | *Revise and then Facilitate ANSI Registrations for releases | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ==Resolution== | ||
| + | Processes are being established from the request, assignment and tracking of individual CMETs through the ballot process. | ||
| + | *The request process is formalized through a GForge tracker. | ||
| + | *Balloting will be formalized via the NIB form (to be completed) | ||
| + | *Ballot results is currently a formal process | ||
| + | *As CMETs pass ballot, they will be submitted (via the request to publish form) to ANSI | ||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 11 June 2013
This page documents a Closed, fully actioned MnM Hot Topic, i.e. a methodology issue requiring a resolution from Modeling and Methodology.
Concerns
- Manage the CMET Identifier and Name Spaces for HL7 UV CMETs
- Maintain CMET Master Spreadsheet - ok
- Manage "root" of cmet names as (example) A_ObservationYadaYadaYada
- Prefix is obvious
- second element is the name determined by the root classCode
- YadaYadaYada should be as generic as possible and represent the content
- Manage the "attribution-level" names and definitions
- Publish a pre-defined set as "preferrred" - if it matches your intentions, use it.
- Review non-"universal" attributions to be sure they are
- Proper constraint on the "universal", if a "universal" exists
- Constraint patterns are appropriate to attribution level definition
- Act as Coordinator
- Assure that Naming is "consistent"
- Needs strong Style Guides that are "testable"
- Allow as much independence to the domains as possible
- Have "managed" "UV" CMETs with domain identifiers from "parent" domain
- Verify that "new" publishing leaves CMET "primary" content in domain directories and builds the "Common" stuff by "including" these
- Revise and then Facilitate ANSI Registrations for releases
Resolution
Processes are being established from the request, assignment and tracking of individual CMETs through the ballot process.
- The request process is formalized through a GForge tracker.
- Balloting will be formalized via the NIB form (to be completed)
- Ballot results is currently a formal process
- As CMETs pass ballot, they will be submitted (via the request to publish form) to ANSI
