This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "CTS2N - 03-July-12"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* Ebere Ogbu, eHO
 
* Ebere Ogbu, eHO
 
* Harold Solbrig
 
* Harold Solbrig
 +
* Vassil Peytchev
  
 
* Russell Hamm (regrets)
 
* Russell Hamm (regrets)
Line 30: Line 31:
 
*'''Action item''': Contact Frank Oemig to see if he is willing to summarize how ECCF can apply to the CTS2 work.
 
*'''Action item''': Contact Frank Oemig to see if he is willing to summarize how ECCF can apply to the CTS2 work.
 
** Pending
 
** Pending
Follow-up:  Ana exhanged mails with Frank, proposed slot to discuss the approach and any other issue.
+
Follow-up:  Ana exhanged mails with Frank, proposed slot to discuss the approach and any other issue.  Action item:  waiting for Frank to respond.
 
*'''Action item''':  Ana will create two tables for Russ to put on a wiki with the corrections and the enhancements (2 separate tables as we might have to deal with them in a different way).
 
*'''Action item''':  Ana will create two tables for Russ to put on a wiki with the corrections and the enhancements (2 separate tables as we might have to deal with them in a different way).
 
** Completed, [[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=CTS2N_Functional_and_Information_Model_Clarifications posted on the wiki]]
 
** Completed, [[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=CTS2N_Functional_and_Information_Model_Clarifications posted on the wiki]]
Line 36: Line 37:
 
== Walk through of first draft of CTS 2 Normative SFM ==
 
== Walk through of first draft of CTS 2 Normative SFM ==
 
* Document available at:  https://www.dropbox.com/s/qv45zstbe15elfd/CTS2N_SFM_July2nd.doc  
 
* Document available at:  https://www.dropbox.com/s/qv45zstbe15elfd/CTS2N_SFM_July2nd.doc  
 
+
* Explain the structure of the document (took the boiler plate from HSSP, realized it was intended for a DSTU, looked at two normative HSSP SFM, XSI and RLUS, approach is similar.
 +
* The preface list all the changes from the DSTU, based on the mile stones.
 +
* Correction and ehancements were discussed in a global manner, with some illustrative examples, while acknowledging that they need to be look at in an individual basis.  Available at:  http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=CTS2_DSTU_Corrections_and_Enhancements
 +
* Explaining the rationale behind the alignment with Core Priciples - track changes left on until approved, some of the original text left in where it felt it was needed to enance clarity.
 +
* The MIF file was obtained from http://www.hl7.org/v3ballotarchive/v3ballot2011sep/html/welcome/environment/index.html.  This needs to be studied, then we need to determine which components are critical for a CTS2 Terminology Server, see how this align with the Core Principles HL7 Vocabulary Model.  (Action item: Harold will take a look at it and make a suggestion).
 +
* Lessons learnt from the OMG CTS2 Implementation pertaining to the HL7 should be included (Action item: Harold to look up document).
 +
* Discussing the [https://dl.dropbox.com/u/84986006/CTS2%20Functional%20Requirements%20Comparison%20Matrix_July2nd.xls] HL7 CTS2 Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix - center piece document - important because it will show any HL7 CTS2 implementer where to look in the PIM to implement a certain functionality and the differences in the information model as well
 
== Preliminary agenda items for next week ==
 
== Preliminary agenda items for next week ==
 
*  
 
*  
  
 
== Action Items ==
 
== Action Items ==
* ANA - Perhaps schedule Q6 in Baltimore for PHAST demo on CTS 2 imp implementation.
+
*

Revision as of 17:04, 3 July 2012

Minutes 19-June-2012

Roll Call

  • Ana Estelrich (AE)
  • Monica Harry (MH)
  • Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
  • Fariba Behzadi, eHO
  • Farzaneh Ashrafi, eHO
  • Ebere Ogbu, eHO
  • Harold Solbrig
  • Vassil Peytchev
  • Russell Hamm (regrets)
  • Kevin Peterson (regrets)
  • Craig Stancl (regrets)
  • Frank Oemig (regrets)


Agenda Check

  • No changes or additions requested


Announcements

  • no announcements

Action Item Review

  • Action item: Russ to ask HS and CS about how this is managed.
    • Complete. Harold provided a solution, which genreated another question. Suggest bringing Harold and Nicolas together on a future call where this is the topic.

Follow-up: call June 25th, 2012 between Nicolas and Harold, issues discussed, documentation to be sent by Harold.

  • Action item: Contact Frank Oemig to see if he is willing to summarize how ECCF can apply to the CTS2 work.
    • Pending

Follow-up: Ana exhanged mails with Frank, proposed slot to discuss the approach and any other issue. Action item: waiting for Frank to respond.

  • Action item: Ana will create two tables for Russ to put on a wiki with the corrections and the enhancements (2 separate tables as we might have to deal with them in a different way).

Walk through of first draft of CTS 2 Normative SFM

  • Document available at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qv45zstbe15elfd/CTS2N_SFM_July2nd.doc
  • Explain the structure of the document (took the boiler plate from HSSP, realized it was intended for a DSTU, looked at two normative HSSP SFM, XSI and RLUS, approach is similar.
  • The preface list all the changes from the DSTU, based on the mile stones.
  • Correction and ehancements were discussed in a global manner, with some illustrative examples, while acknowledging that they need to be look at in an individual basis. Available at: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=CTS2_DSTU_Corrections_and_Enhancements
  • Explaining the rationale behind the alignment with Core Priciples - track changes left on until approved, some of the original text left in where it felt it was needed to enance clarity.
  • The MIF file was obtained from http://www.hl7.org/v3ballotarchive/v3ballot2011sep/html/welcome/environment/index.html. This needs to be studied, then we need to determine which components are critical for a CTS2 Terminology Server, see how this align with the Core Principles HL7 Vocabulary Model. (Action item: Harold will take a look at it and make a suggestion).
  • Lessons learnt from the OMG CTS2 Implementation pertaining to the HL7 should be included (Action item: Harold to look up document).
  • Discussing the [1] HL7 CTS2 Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix - center piece document - important because it will show any HL7 CTS2 implementer where to look in the PIM to implement a certain functionality and the differences in the information model as well

Preliminary agenda items for next week

Action Items