This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "February 14th, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* Vocabulary | * Vocabulary | ||
** (See items listed above) | ** (See items listed above) | ||
− | ** | + | ** All 4 items have been submitted to vocab. We have until march to make changes to the proposals. |
+ | ** Security Vocabulary Proposal 2 -- was submitted to vocab. We have some time to make final modifications. | ||
+ | *** Kathleen walked us through the proposal as currently stands | ||
+ | ** Security Vocabulary Proposal 2 -- ActSecurityPolicyType, ActObligationSecurityPolicyType, ActRefrainSecuityPolicyType | ||
+ | *** add new object to hold Privacy policy | ||
+ | *** allows something like a CDA document to have at each section within a pointer to policy that (obligations and refrains) that rule over that section. | ||
+ | *** creates new vocabulary -- | ||
+ | *** Action: Reminder to workgroups to review | ||
+ | ** Security Vocabulary Proposal 3 - PurposeOfUse ActReason Vocabulary | ||
+ | *** update to harmonize PurposeOfUse codes | ||
+ | *** added some, clarified others, harmonized with ISO | ||
+ | *** Action: Workgroup members review | ||
* ISO documents request | * ISO documents request | ||
** (See item above) | ** (See item above) | ||
− | ** | + | ** see motion below |
+ | * Mike observes that we need more education on RIM and vocabulary -- to help us understand our proposals | ||
+ | ** Kathleen suggests that Russ would be the best at explaining to our WG members | ||
+ | ** Action: Tony will reach out to Russ. Attempt a tutorial thursday afternoon in Vancouver | ||
+ | |||
+ | Motions: | ||
+ | * Nominate Kathleen as interim Vocabulary representative for Security Wg | ||
+ | ** Mike makes motion | ||
+ | ** Bill seconds | ||
+ | ** Passes 7,0,0 | ||
+ | * Approve the list of needed ISO documents (see above) as the list of documents that HL7 will request for WG use | ||
+ | ** Kathleen make motion | ||
+ | ** Passes 7,0,0 |
Revision as of 19:00, 14 February 2012
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Kathleen Connor
- Ed Coyne
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Tony Weida
- Trish Williams
- Braithwaite
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (05 min) 4th Co-Chair addition - Mike Davis
- (15 min) Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Status Update - Tony Weida
- (20 min) HL7 Harmonization Meeting - Kathleen Connor
- (05 min) Approval of the list of ISO documents requested - Kathleen Connor
Documents to be discussed:
- Vocabulary
- ActPrivacyPolicyType Technical Correction
- HL7 Harmonization Proposal March 2012 - Technical Correction ActPolicyType
- Purpose of Use Vocabulary Harmonization Proposal HL7 Harmonization Proposal March 2012 - Purpose of Use ]
- Act Security, Obligation, and Refrain Policy Vocabulary Harmonization Proposal
- ISO
Minutes
- Ballot is out for approval of 4th co-chair. Early results are all positive
- Missed deadline of the 10th was missed, for nominations for new co-chair positions at the Vancouver meeting.
- There is a process we can use for Interim co-chair. This will hold over until formal
- Ontology
- Submitting the ontology project for intent to ballot with target beyond Vancouver.
- there is a risk that we might not have the work done due to resource constraints. If so, we can withdraw our ballot.
- Vocabulary
- (See items listed above)
- All 4 items have been submitted to vocab. We have until march to make changes to the proposals.
- Security Vocabulary Proposal 2 -- was submitted to vocab. We have some time to make final modifications.
- Kathleen walked us through the proposal as currently stands
- Security Vocabulary Proposal 2 -- ActSecurityPolicyType, ActObligationSecurityPolicyType, ActRefrainSecuityPolicyType
- add new object to hold Privacy policy
- allows something like a CDA document to have at each section within a pointer to policy that (obligations and refrains) that rule over that section.
- creates new vocabulary --
- Action: Reminder to workgroups to review
- Security Vocabulary Proposal 3 - PurposeOfUse ActReason Vocabulary
- update to harmonize PurposeOfUse codes
- added some, clarified others, harmonized with ISO
- Action: Workgroup members review
- ISO documents request
- (See item above)
- see motion below
- Mike observes that we need more education on RIM and vocabulary -- to help us understand our proposals
- Kathleen suggests that Russ would be the best at explaining to our WG members
- Action: Tony will reach out to Russ. Attempt a tutorial thursday afternoon in Vancouver
Motions:
- Nominate Kathleen as interim Vocabulary representative for Security Wg
- Mike makes motion
- Bill seconds
- Passes 7,0,0
- Approve the list of needed ISO documents (see above) as the list of documents that HL7 will request for WG use
- Kathleen make motion
- Passes 7,0,0