This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CS Sept 2011 WGM Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Thursday Q3 *Motion that typos are addressed by the Editor. Charlie, Patrick **Discussion: Mead - May not need this motion. **Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 9 Scope of Clin...") |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Thursday Q3 | Thursday Q3 | ||
*Motion that typos are addressed by the Editor. Charlie, Patrick | *Motion that typos are addressed by the Editor. Charlie, Patrick | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
Unclear what the rules would be to make a pattern an IMDP. | Unclear what the rules would be to make a pattern an IMDP. | ||
| − | * Current Topics are incosistent with the current pattern in terms of scope and approach. Rather we should consider them as potential IMDPs. We're not sure what MnM considers an IMDP vs. SAIF's Composite. Until such time the motion is to remove the topics from the Clinical Statement model, but keep them on the shelve (on a wiki page). Rik, Patrick | + | * Current Topics are incosistent with the current pattern in terms of scope and approach. Rather we should consider them as potential IMDPs possibly under the ownership of other domains. We're not sure what MnM considers an IMDP vs. SAIF's Composite. Until such time the motion is to remove the topics from the Clinical Statement model, but keep them on the shelve (on a wiki page). Rik, Patrick |
| − | ** Since "on-the-shelf" is not very pro-active, should we do something with it. Ownership of IMDP is not yet clear. | + | ** Since "on-the-shelf" is not very pro-active, should we do something with it. Ownership of IMDP is not yet clear. CS will at least look at next steps. |
| + | **Against: 0; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 6 | ||
Revision as of 22:03, 15 September 2011
Thursday Q3
- Motion that typos are addressed by the Editor. Charlie, Patrick
- Discussion: Mead - May not need this motion.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 9
Scope of Clin Statement is driven based on Change Request.
Pattern New name IMDP – Information Model Design Pattern. Official, MnM approved nuggets of modeling.
Discussion whether CS is an IMDP. Lloyd McKenzie believes the entire CS pattern today would not fit IMDP, but parts thereof. CS topics would be close this.
An IMDP could be a template for its intended use for modelers.
Topics don’t seem to fit with CS Pattern as it sits today. A motion to remove did not get quorum.
Unclear what the rules would be to make a pattern an IMDP.
- Current Topics are incosistent with the current pattern in terms of scope and approach. Rather we should consider them as potential IMDPs possibly under the ownership of other domains. We're not sure what MnM considers an IMDP vs. SAIF's Composite. Until such time the motion is to remove the topics from the Clinical Statement model, but keep them on the shelve (on a wiki page). Rik, Patrick
- Since "on-the-shelf" is not very pro-active, should we do something with it. Ownership of IMDP is not yet clear. CS will at least look at next steps.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 6
