Difference between revisions of "2010-10-04 PA WGM Minutes"
(Tue Q1) |
|||
Line 428: | Line 428: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | + | The WG reviewed the wiki for background information and for defining what is within the scope of the PA Working Group. The current scope is to define the interactions across the following topics:<br/> | |
+ | *Person topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain) | ||
+ | *Patient topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain) | ||
+ | *Service Delivery Location (DSTU in Patient Administration domain) | ||
+ | *Provider topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain) | ||
+ | *Organization topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain) | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | The WG needs to explore further whether work on the following topics for this effort should be done within the PAWG: | ||
+ | *Health Service | ||
+ | *Health Program | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Next the WG reviewed business cases beyond the interest of Netherlands, Australia and Canada, including interest based on US HITSP needs, US Health Information Technology Policy Committee’s Information Exchange Workgroup and the HL7 EHR System Functional Model (IN.3 Registry and Directory Services). Defined use cases were reviewed in the wiki: | ||
+ | *ONC Use Case - Consumer empowerment: consumer access to clinical information | ||
+ | *ONC Use Case - Consultation and Transfer of Care | ||
+ | *ONC Use Case - Scheduling | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | The PAWG also reviewed current standards around provider registries along with the following analysis documents | ||
+ | *HITSP Information Interchange Subcommittee Interface to Provider Directory/Registry Harmonization Project | ||
+ | *Healthcare, Community Services and Provider Director Service Functional Profile, Release 1 mapped to HL7 Personnel Management | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Gregg proposed that the wiki be the area where the PAWG does it’s work for this effort. | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | The PAWG decided that understanding the business cases would be the best first step to defining the use cases for this effort. | ||
+ | Jay volunteered to review the presentation “Blueprint 2015 Interdependent Registries – A Discussion Paper“ to review the business case so that the PAWG would be clear on the business case. | ||
+ | For Canada, the business case includes: | ||
+ | *EHRs | ||
+ | *Health System Services | ||
+ | *Consumer Health Solutions | ||
+ | *Clinical Decision Support | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | HL7 Netherlands represented by Alexander Henket the business case includes the need for an application registry to include in this interdependency. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== |
Revision as of 16:42, 24 November 2010
Contents
- 1 PA work group meeting Monday Q3
- 2 PA work group meeting Monday Q4
- 3 PA work group meeting Tuesday Q1
- 4 PA work group meeting Tuesday Q3
- 5 PA work group meeting Tuesday Q4
- 6 PA work group meeting Wednesday Q1
- 7 PA work group meeting Wednesday Q2
- 8 PA work group meeting Wednesday Q3
- 9 PA work group meeting Wednesday Q4
- 10 PA work group meeting Thursday Q1
- 11 PA work group meeting Thursday Q3
- 12 PA work group meeting Thursday Q4
PA work group meeting Monday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-04 Time: Monday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | Gregg Seppala | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Gregg Seppala | VHA | |
X | Jay Zimmerman | HL7 Canada | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
X | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Line Saele | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
X | Morten Myhre | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
X | Adri Burggraaff | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Welcome/Introductions
- Agenda review and approval
- Motion: Approve agenda as published on 9/20/2010
- Review Mission and Charter
- New Decision Making Practices review and approval
- Motion: Approve revised Decision Making Practices as published on 9/28/2010
- SWOT review
- Work Plan review
Supporting Documents
- Cambridge Agenda (2010-09-20)
- Mission and Charter (2010-01-19)
- Current Approved DMP (2009-05-13)
- Revised DMP Draft (2010-09-14)
- PA SWOT (2010-01-18)
- Work Plan (2010-02-01)
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Welcome/Introductions
- Review and Approve Agenda
- Motion (made by Jay / seconded by Alex): Approve agenda as is
- Vote: 8 / 0 / 0 (for, against, abstain)
- Review Mission & Charter
- The HL7 Process Improvement work group issued a new generic Decision Making Process template. Each work group was requested to review their existing DMP to see whether it covers all the issues addressed by the new generic DMP. Gregg drafted a new DMP for PA based on the generic DMP and the current PA DMP (See Revised DMP Draft (2010-09-14). That was sent to the PA list for consideration on September 28. The new DMP is very similar to our current DMP except that it provides more clarity regarding email voting. In our last revision we removed proxy voting and added email voting but we were not very specific about our procedures surrounding email votes.
- Motion (made by Jay / seconded by Jane): Accept revised DMP as posted to the list server on September 28, 2010
- Discussion: Further discussion was held, with clarification that the quorum for the PAWG being chair plus 4 members
- Vote: 8 / 0 / 0
- SWOT discussion
- WG reviewed the SWOT and agreed that the environment is the same. No changes made. Still valid.
- Review Work Plan
- The WG reviewed the work plan as it was January 1, 2010. Service Delivery Location, Provider Registry and Organization Registry were originally scheduled to peer-review for May 2010 with DSTU in January 2011. This will more than likely have to change. So, the WG is aware that this schedule will have to change by the end of this week when these items will be discussed in more detail. For now, the WG sees no changes to the work plan as it is.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Monday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-04 Time: Monday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | Gregg Seppala | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Gregg Seppala | VHA | |
X | Jay Zimmerman | HL7 Canada | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
X | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Line Saele | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
X | Morten Myhre | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
X | Adri Burggraaff | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Interdependent Provider Registry Proposal
- Scope
- Timelines
- Deliverables
- Resources
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Interdependent Registry Scope
- The WG reviewed slides presented by Ron Parker at Canada Infoway to PAwg at the Rio meeting, describing the interdependency of the various registries (e.g. service delivery location, provider registry, organization registry, etc.) Observation was made that some of these interdependent registries are RIM class role based registries (organization, provider, service delivery) while others are ACT based registries (Health program, Health service, etc.) registries that might be overseen by other WG domains.
- Gregg presented wiki page summarizing possible needs for the US realm. Gaps were identified (e.g. HITSP/IS03 (Consumer Empowerment and Access to clinical information via Networks) and HITSP/CAP121 (Communicate Referral Request)). Further slides not in the original presentation were viewed that defined more gaps, business needs and use cases as well as other efforts for interdependencies of registries based on provider needs.
- The scope of this work would be Provider, Person, Patient, Service Delivery location, Organization registries. The WG has questions whether the group’s scope includes Device. Health Program and Health Service would, for now, be placeholders for defining within which group the scope would lie.
- The WG discussed the possible need for an application registry.
- Timeline
- Jay explained that for Canada, the interdependencies framework needs to be in place and implemented by 2015. Working back, this means that the standards that might govern this, would have to be complete within 18 months or by the end of 2012. It was decided that there would be a DSTU cycle to allow for feedback and change without too many changes to try to track and implement. This means that final DSTU would have to be approved 01/2012, with normative in 02/2013 (work being performed in the 05/2012 and 09/2012). The WG could work on a Domain Analysis Model (DAM) in 01/2011 and ballot in 05/2011, which would move the work on this forward quicker.
- Deliverables
- The WG would need use cases, requirements from those use cases, in support of this effort. This includes the updated DAM to include interdependent registries information. The DAM will include both a dynamic model and a static model.
- Resources
- The WG discussed the need for resources, noting that volunteers may not be sufficient for moving this effort forward. Canada, Jay, will assist with the DAM analysis, while the VA has offered help in the form of a resource to review once the DAM analysis has been complete.
- Conclusions
- Since this is a requirement from Netherlands and Australia, their representatives should review the requirements. The WG proposed finding more interested entities to review requirements.
- Motion (Jay /Wendy) Move to adjourn for the day Vote: 8 /0 / 0
- Adjourn at 5pm
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Tuesday Q1
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-05 Time: Tuesday Q1 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Gregg Seppala | VHA | |
X | Jay Zimmerman | HL7 Canada | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
X | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Line Saele | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
X | Morten Myhre | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
. | Adri Burggraaff | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Interdependent Provider Registry - Define Use Cases
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
The WG reviewed the wiki for background information and for defining what is within the scope of the PA Working Group. The current scope is to define the interactions across the following topics:
- Person topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
- Patient topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
- Service Delivery Location (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
- Provider topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain)
- Organization topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain)
The WG needs to explore further whether work on the following topics for this effort should be done within the PAWG:
- Health Service
- Health Program
Next the WG reviewed business cases beyond the interest of Netherlands, Australia and Canada, including interest based on US HITSP needs, US Health Information Technology Policy Committee’s Information Exchange Workgroup and the HL7 EHR System Functional Model (IN.3 Registry and Directory Services). Defined use cases were reviewed in the wiki:
- ONC Use Case - Consumer empowerment: consumer access to clinical information
- ONC Use Case - Consultation and Transfer of Care
- ONC Use Case - Scheduling
The PAWG also reviewed current standards around provider registries along with the following analysis documents
- HITSP Information Interchange Subcommittee Interface to Provider Directory/Registry Harmonization Project
- Healthcare, Community Services and Provider Director Service Functional Profile, Release 1 mapped to HL7 Personnel Management
Gregg proposed that the wiki be the area where the PAWG does it’s work for this effort.
The PAWG decided that understanding the business cases would be the best first step to defining the use cases for this effort.
Jay volunteered to review the presentation “Blueprint 2015 Interdependent Registries – A Discussion Paper“ to review the business case so that the PAWG would be clear on the business case.
For Canada, the business case includes:
- EHRs
- Health System Services
- Consumer Health Solutions
- Clinical Decision Support
HL7 Netherlands represented by Alexander Henket the business case includes the need for an application registry to include in this interdependency.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Tuesday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-05 Time: Tuesday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Interdependent Provider Registry - Define Use Cases
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Tuesday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-05 Time: Tuesday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Interdependent Provider Registry - Define Requirements
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Wednesday Q1
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-06 Time: Wednesday Q1 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V2.8 New Content Proposals
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Wednesday Q2
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-06 Time: Wednesday Q2 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Link / unlink roles in registries (Spronk)
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Wednesday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-06 Time: Wednesday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Approve minutes from Rio WGM
- Plan next meeting (Sydney)
- V3 Work - Harmonization proposals
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Wednesday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-06 Time: Wednesday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Encounter DSTU Findings
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Thursday Q1
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-07 Time: Thursday Q1 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Registry Service Specification
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Thursday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-07 Time: Thursday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Registry Service Specification
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
PA work group meeting Thursday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Parlor 211 |
Date: 2010-10-07 Time: Thursday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | <Chair of Meeting> | Note taker(s) | <Scribe of Meeting> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
[mark x if on the conference call, or regrets] | [In this section, list those on the conference call] | [In this section, record attendee affiliation to identify preponderance of influence; indicate those guests that are not members of the WG.] | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices? |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Schedule conference calls
- Approve next ballot
- Update Work Plan
- Adjourn
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2010 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.