Difference between revisions of "Implementation FAQ:Implementer Organization"
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This page contains recommendations related to the organization or project that is responsible for the implementation. | + | This page contains questions and recommendations related to the organization or project that is responsible for the implementation. |
| + | |||
| + | Back to [[Implementation FAQ]] | ||
==Questions== | ==Questions== | ||
Revision as of 11:02, 26 May 2006
This page contains questions and recommendations related to the organization or project that is responsible for the implementation.
Back to Implementation FAQ
Contents
Questions
(add a question if you so desire)
Recommendations
Overcome steep learning curve
Make sure to invest both time and resources in the initial phase. The cost to entry is significant, however once you know the basics it is relatively easy to extend. The HL7 object model introduces complexity for simple messages on the one hand, but provides a unified model for complex clinical messages.
Need a "keeper of the vision"
Designate one person to keep the architecture and the business requirements (as a whole) on a consistent track. Otherwise scope creep will ensure they are disjunctive.
Exchange experiences with other v3 implementers
The exchange of experience in a forum with other implementers/vendors saves money. HL7 affiliate organizations offer a platform for such a forum.
