Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20100407"
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Some comments on resilience of publishing process to artifact releases. | Some comments on resilience of publishing process to artifact releases. | ||
− | + | GWB fixed many of the references but did miss some and is working to correct. | |
− | + | Also has a possible fix for the artref issue. Can be validated when the intermediate file is generated. | |
− | + | GWB is looking for a critique of the QA report text. Should the explanatory parts be in clamshell? | |
− | + | In the report: | |
− | |||
− | * | + | *Yellow is fatal (the XSD schema or MIF will fail to validate) |
+ | *No colour is non-fatal (error may not be significant or relevant) | ||
− | + | Additionally added a CMET reference check. | |
− | |||
− | + | GS:when you pick a name out of CMET Info does it copy the name and the ID? | |
+ | GWB: Yes, but it may not update with changes to the CMET info. | ||
− | + | The bottom of the QA report is summary data for all domains. | |
− | + | One possible additional category is have Static Model that contains bi-directional navigation, for DL and GWB mainly. | |
− | + | The preview site known issues report appears to be old (may not have been checked in, GWB will verify). | |
+ | |||
+ | Also reviewed RMIM Designer text error report | ||
===Normative Edition=== | ===Normative Edition=== | ||
− | GWB: final content? | + | GWB: final content determined? |
− | DL: | + | |
+ | DL: Yes, tomorrow would contact and make sure he has the actual content and get it checked in. Will then start building preview guide for NE | ||
===Jean Duteau=== | ===Jean Duteau=== | ||
− | + | Has created some modifications to the V3 Generator to run on Windows-based systems, would like to contribute. Would it be possible to be granted SVN update access on GForge? | |
GWB gave commit access | GWB gave commit access |
Revision as of 21:25, 13 April 2010
Contents
Wednesday, April 7, 2010 -- 4:00 PM Eastern
Present
Beeler (GWB), Duteau (JD), Kreisler (AK), Lloyd {DL), Seppala (GS), Stechishin (AS), Savage (RS), Stuart (SS)
Agenda
Call to order at 4:07
Review Minutes of March 24, 2010 and March 31, 2010
not done
Gregg Seppala
Some comments on resilience of publishing process to artifact releases.
GWB fixed many of the references but did miss some and is working to correct. Also has a possible fix for the artref issue. Can be validated when the intermediate file is generated.
GWB is looking for a critique of the QA report text. Should the explanatory parts be in clamshell? In the report:
- Yellow is fatal (the XSD schema or MIF will fail to validate)
- No colour is non-fatal (error may not be significant or relevant)
Additionally added a CMET reference check.
GS:when you pick a name out of CMET Info does it copy the name and the ID? GWB: Yes, but it may not update with changes to the CMET info.
The bottom of the QA report is summary data for all domains.
One possible additional category is have Static Model that contains bi-directional navigation, for DL and GWB mainly.
The preview site known issues report appears to be old (may not have been checked in, GWB will verify).
Also reviewed RMIM Designer text error report
Normative Edition
GWB: final content determined?
DL: Yes, tomorrow would contact and make sure he has the actual content and get it checked in. Will then start building preview guide for NE
Jean Duteau
Has created some modifications to the V3 Generator to run on Windows-based systems, would like to contribute. Would it be possible to be granted SVN update access on GForge?
GWB gave commit access
Adjourned at 4:59
Action Items
GWB: Post sample RMIM Designer report to list