Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20081105"
(New page: :Return to Publishing Committee :Minutes of Recent Publishing Conference Calls ==Wednesday, November 5, 2008 -- 4:00 PM East...) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Present== | ==Present== | ||
| − | Beeler | + | Beeler, Kreisler, Lloyd, Seppala, Stechishin, Savage, Madra |
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | === | + | # Role call and agenda |
| − | === | + | # Request for PHER CMET delay |
| − | ==== | + | # Can we make artref IDs "version-less" |
| − | === | + | # Progress report on Subversion Use and Support |
| + | # Notes from Don Lloyd | ||
| + | # Around the table | ||
| + | ===Role call and agenda=== | ||
| + | Andy, Austin unanimous | ||
| + | ===Review Minutes of October 29, 2008=== | ||
| + | PH Split was approved by PHER WG, with no opoposition voiced by RCRIM co-chairs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Andy, Rob unanimous | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Request for PHER CMET delay==== | ||
| + | Desire is to submit CMETs after we know what happens after consideration of the Entity group proposal from Schadow to revert to "old" language. This will change will "break" certain CMET designs from PHER and will alter model of "groups" as an Entity. In September RoundTable noted that there are designs based on "current" RIM, but usage was in violation of the "current state." | ||
| + | |||
| + | Propose to accept the CMETs on time, with agreement that we will entertain updating these after the Harmonization if this is necessary. If the RIM changes, thet may need to defer for this cycle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Austin, Madra unanimous | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Can we make artref IDs "version-less"=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Adjourned at ???== | ==Adjourned at ???== | ||
==Future Business== | ==Future Business== | ||
#List here | #List here | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 5 November 2008
Contents
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 -- 4:00 PM Eastern
Present
Beeler, Kreisler, Lloyd, Seppala, Stechishin, Savage, Madra
Agenda
- Role call and agenda
- Request for PHER CMET delay
- Can we make artref IDs "version-less"
- Progress report on Subversion Use and Support
- Notes from Don Lloyd
- Around the table
Role call and agenda
Andy, Austin unanimous
Review Minutes of October 29, 2008
PH Split was approved by PHER WG, with no opoposition voiced by RCRIM co-chairs.
Andy, Rob unanimous
Request for PHER CMET delay
Desire is to submit CMETs after we know what happens after consideration of the Entity group proposal from Schadow to revert to "old" language. This will change will "break" certain CMET designs from PHER and will alter model of "groups" as an Entity. In September RoundTable noted that there are designs based on "current" RIM, but usage was in violation of the "current state."
Propose to accept the CMETs on time, with agreement that we will entertain updating these after the Harmonization if this is necessary. If the RIM changes, thet may need to defer for this cycle.
Austin, Madra unanimous
Can we make artref IDs "version-less"
Adjourned at ???
Future Business
- List here
