This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "26 October 2018 CQI Conference call Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
 
* Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
 
* Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
 
* Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
 
* Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
 +
** Davinci doing use case 4 discovery work. That would be a good place to do project calls. Prioritize the DEQM measures that will be used.
 +
** Asking the group if its ok that it takes 2-3 weeks until the discovery will be done.
 +
** The DEQM defines the framework and every time a new quality measure is based on the DEQM framework, does that live outside fo the IG/Framework? Dont want to ballot the IG every time. 
 +
** QRDA doesn't define the a QRDA report for each eCQM. DEQM should do the same - define the framework but not have a profile per measure.
 +
** Bryn recommends separating concerns so that a general framework can be defined that doesn't change per measure. it supports a known set of measures and is a general framework.
 +
** Perhaps we need a guidance document that exists b/w DEQM and the specific quality measure that you want to support.
 +
** General concepts need to be sorted out - i.e. how does the framework work and what the structure is.
 +
** Gaps in Care might get included in the Davinci use case for reporting/DEQM - Viet to reach out to KP.
 +
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
* Davinci doing use case 4 discovery work. That would be a good place to do project calls. Prioritize the DEQM measures that will be used.  
+
 
−
* Asking the group if its ok that it takes 2-3 weeks until the discovery will be done.  
+
FHIR clinical reasoning tracker items - Bryn <br>
−
* The DEQM defines the framework and every time a new quality measure is based on the DEQM framework, does that live outside fo the IG/Framework? Dont want to ballot the IG every time. 
+
* [https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=18236&start=0 18236 Define profiles in support of aggregate data exchange]
−
* QRDA doesn't define the a QRDA report for each eCQM. DEQM should do the same - define the framework but not have a profile per measure.
+
**
−
*
+
* [https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=19238&start=0 19238 Fix History file (conflated with CRD)]
 +
* [https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=18084&start=0 18084 Consider changing the Coverage.type binding to the CMS Payer value set]
 +
* [https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=17623&start=0 17623 Support multiple components per stratifier]

Revision as of 17:47, 26 October 2018

Back to CQI Agenda and Minutes Page
Back to CQI Wiki Page

10.26.18 - CQI Conference Call Agenda

HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup
10.26.18 – 1-3 PM EDT
Dial in: 770-657-9270 Passcode: 217663
https://join.freeconferencecall.com/hl7cqi
CQI Co-chairs: Patty Craig, Floyd Eisenberg, Juliet Rubini, KP Sethi, Yan Heras
Meeting Chair: Floyd
Meeting Scribe: KP

Agenda

Agenda Item Time Allotment
1 Roll call
 5 minutes
2 FHIR Data Exchange for Quality Measures (project 1429)-Viet/ Bryn
  • Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
  • Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
 20 minutes
3 FHIR clinical reasoning tracker items - Bryn
30 minutes
4 Composite related harmonization item - Informational item - no action required - Rob McClure

Topic - Improvement notation

  • Initial submission completed 10/25; Final submission due 11/6 (if changes requested after harmonization review of initial submission
  • Next harmonization meeting 11/8
 10 minutes
5 Draft QRDA Category I STU 5.1 for review (Yan)
20 minutes
6 Confirm - no Notification of Intent to Ballot (NIB) for CQI for January 2019 ballot cycle
  • NIB deadline - 10/28/2018
 5 minutes
7 Confluence is coming!
  • Confluence will replace the Wiki for agendas and the HL7 work group page for document posting
  • Please sign up for an account here
  • Draft confluence page available here
 10 minutes
8 Project Updates
 10 minutes
9 Notifications
  • Balloting Milestones
    • October 14, 2018 – PSS deadline (submit to Steering Division and Project Management Office) - DEADLINE HAS PASSED
    • October 28, 2018 – Notice for Intent to Ballot (NIB) Deadline
    • November 5 – December 6 – Sign up period to be included in a ballot consensus group
    • November 11, 2018 – Preview of artifacts and topics to be included in the ballot with CQI
    • November 18, 2018 – Preview and content deadline (V3)
    • November 25, 2018 – Final content available for CQI WG review [consistent with FHIR Core Substantive Change Freeze (must have completed ballot reconciliation if applicable)
    • December 1, 2018 – Final CQI approval of content and submission (consistent with FHIR code freeze and QA, V3 Final content due dates)
    • December 7, 2018 – January 7, 2019 – January ballot open for voting
  • Harmonization
    • October 25, 2018 – Initial Harmonization Proposal Deadline
    • November 6, 2018 – Final Harmonization Proposal Deadline
    • November 8 – Harmonization meeting
 None

Minutes:

FHIR Data Exchange for Quality Measures (project 1429)-Viet/ Bryn

  • Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
  • Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
    • Davinci doing use case 4 discovery work. That would be a good place to do project calls. Prioritize the DEQM measures that will be used.
    • Asking the group if its ok that it takes 2-3 weeks until the discovery will be done.
    • The DEQM defines the framework and every time a new quality measure is based on the DEQM framework, does that live outside fo the IG/Framework? Dont want to ballot the IG every time.
    • QRDA doesn't define the a QRDA report for each eCQM. DEQM should do the same - define the framework but not have a profile per measure.
    • Bryn recommends separating concerns so that a general framework can be defined that doesn't change per measure. it supports a known set of measures and is a general framework.
    • Perhaps we need a guidance document that exists b/w DEQM and the specific quality measure that you want to support.
    • General concepts need to be sorted out - i.e. how does the framework work and what the structure is.
    • Gaps in Care might get included in the Davinci use case for reporting/DEQM - Viet to reach out to KP.


FHIR clinical reasoning tracker items - Bryn

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=26_October_2018_CQI_Conference_call_Minutes&oldid=162898"