This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "26 October 2018 CQI Conference call Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Clinical_Quality_Information_Conference_Call_Agendas_and_Minutes Back to CQI Agenda and Minutes Page] <br> [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?...")
 
Line 88: Line 88:
 
| row2cell3 | None
 
| row2cell3 | None
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
Minutes:
 +
 +
FHIR Data Exchange for Quality Measures (project 1429)-Viet/ Bryn <br>
 +
* Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
 +
* Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
 +
<br>
 +
* Davinci doing use case 4 discovery work. That would be a good place to do project calls. Prioritize the DEQM measures that will be used.
 +
* Asking the group if its ok that it takes 2-3 weeks until the discovery will be done.
 +
* The DEQM defines the framework and every time a new quality measure is based on the DEQM framework, does that live outside fo the IG/Framework? Dont want to ballot the IG every time. 
 +
* QRDA doesn't define the a QRDA report for each eCQM. DEQM should do the same - define the framework but not have a profile per measure.
 +
*

Revision as of 17:16, 26 October 2018

Back to CQI Agenda and Minutes Page
Back to CQI Wiki Page

10.26.18 - CQI Conference Call Agenda

HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup
10.26.18 – 1-3 PM EDT
Dial in: 770-657-9270 Passcode: 217663
https://join.freeconferencecall.com/hl7cqi
CQI Co-chairs: Patty Craig, Floyd Eisenberg, Juliet Rubini, KP Sethi, Yan Heras
Meeting Chair: Floyd
Meeting Scribe: KP

Agenda

Agenda Item Time Allotment
1 Roll call
5 minutes
2 FHIR Data Exchange for Quality Measures (project 1429)-Viet/ Bryn
  • Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
  • Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting
20 minutes
3 FHIR clinical reasoning tracker items - Bryn
30 minutes
4 Composite related harmonization item - Informational item - no action required - Rob McClure

Topic - Improvement notation

  • Initial submission completed 10/25; Final submission due 11/6 (if changes requested after harmonization review of initial submission
  • Next harmonization meeting 11/8
10 minutes
5 Draft QRDA Category I STU 5.1 for review (Yan)
20 minutes
6 Confirm - no Notification of Intent to Ballot (NIB) for CQI for January 2019 ballot cycle
  • NIB deadline - 10/28/2018
5 minutes
7 Confluence is coming!
  • Confluence will replace the Wiki for agendas and the HL7 work group page for document posting
  • Please sign up for an account here
  • Draft confluence page available here
10 minutes
8 Project Updates
10 minutes
9 Notifications
  • Balloting Milestones
    • October 14, 2018 – PSS deadline (submit to Steering Division and Project Management Office) - DEADLINE HAS PASSED
    • October 28, 2018 – Notice for Intent to Ballot (NIB) Deadline
    • November 5 – December 6 – Sign up period to be included in a ballot consensus group
    • November 11, 2018 – Preview of artifacts and topics to be included in the ballot with CQI
    • November 18, 2018 – Preview and content deadline (V3)
    • November 25, 2018 – Final content available for CQI WG review [consistent with FHIR Core Substantive Change Freeze (must have completed ballot reconciliation if applicable)
    • December 1, 2018 – Final CQI approval of content and submission (consistent with FHIR code freeze and QA, V3 Final content due dates)
    • December 7, 2018 – January 7, 2019 – January ballot open for voting
  • Harmonization
    • October 25, 2018 – Initial Harmonization Proposal Deadline
    • November 6, 2018 – Final Harmonization Proposal Deadline
    • November 8 – Harmonization meeting
None

Minutes:

FHIR Data Exchange for Quality Measures (project 1429)-Viet/ Bryn

  • Ballot Reconciliation Deferred until November 2, 2018
  • Discuss potential expansion for individual and aggregate quality reporting


  • Davinci doing use case 4 discovery work. That would be a good place to do project calls. Prioritize the DEQM measures that will be used.
  • Asking the group if its ok that it takes 2-3 weeks until the discovery will be done.
  • The DEQM defines the framework and every time a new quality measure is based on the DEQM framework, does that live outside fo the IG/Framework? Dont want to ballot the IG every time.
  • QRDA doesn't define the a QRDA report for each eCQM. DEQM should do the same - define the framework but not have a profile per measure.