This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "PRO FHIR IG Proposal"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 118: Line 118:
 
==Timelines==
 
==Timelines==
  
Comment Only Ballot for Sep 2018
+
Ballot for Comment in September 2018 Cycle
STU Ballot in January 2019
+
 
 +
STU Ballot in January 2019 Cycle
 +
 
 +
The project timelines are driven by new pilots and challenge grants starting in the fall of 2018. These pilots are intending to base their implementation on the IG as an official document to provide a common baseline for all activities.
 +
 
 +
In addition, there are currently ongoing pilots, who are actively started to use the IG and have started providing feedback and this can be directly captured as part of the ballot process. In addition coordination with Argonaut and the Northwestern Team implementing Questionnaires and  PROs provides a good opportunity for collaboration with an existing IG that can be reviewed critically and feedback obtained and incorporated for the STU version.
 +
 
 +
All of the above activities are driven by the end date of September 2019 before which a robust IG is expected to be published that can be leveraged by PRO implementers including EHR vendors and other organizations.
  
 
==When IG Proposal Is Complete==
 
==When IG Proposal Is Complete==

Revision as of 13:59, 8 August 2018



Patient Reported Outcomes

Patient Reported Outcomes FHIR IG

Owning work group name

FHIR-I

Committee Approval Date:

2018-02-05

Contributing or Reviewing Work Groups

  • Patient Care
  • BR&R
  • O&O


FHIR Development Project Insight ID

1433

Scope of coverage

The Scope of the IG is to use the following resources for Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) capture and exchange.

  • Questionnaire
  • QuestionnaireResponse
  • Observation
  • ProcedureRequest

IG Purpose

A landscape analysis on the use of PROs in clinical care and research settings were conducted the outcomes of which have identified the lack of standardization in the creation, administration and sharing of PRO data even if they would help with the outcome for patients. In order to improve the use of PRO data in the clinical workflow the following needs have been identified for standardization • Need to identify relevant PROMs for each domain using defined data elements and vocabularies • Need to enable PROM administration within EMRs • Need to enable PROM administration using apps outside of EMRs • Need to share PROM responses to clinicians, researchers and care managers.


Content location

https://github.com/HL7/patient-reported-outcomes


Proposed IG realm and code

U.S

Maintenance Plan

Short Description

This IG provides the necessary guidance to use FHIR for Patient Reported Outcomes.

Long Description

A landscape analysis on the use of PROs in clinical care and research settings were conducted the outcomes of which have identified the lack of standardization in the creation, administration and sharing of PRO data even if they would help with the outcome for patients. In order to improve the use of PRO data in the clinical workflow the following needs have been identified for standardization • Need to identify relevant PROMs for each domain using defined data elements and vocabularies • Need to enable PROM administration within EMRs • Need to enable PROM administration using apps outside of EMRs • Need to share PROM responses to clinicians, researchers and care managers.


Involved parties

ONC

Expected implementations

REACHnet PCORnet CDRN pSCANNER PCORnet CDRN

Content sources

SDC FHIR IG Argonaut Questionnaire Work


Example Scenarios

  • Creation and Administering a Physical Function PRO to a Patient after a hip replacement and scoring the results prior to their next appointment.

IG Relationships

SDC IG US Core IG

Timelines

Ballot for Comment in September 2018 Cycle

STU Ballot in January 2019 Cycle

The project timelines are driven by new pilots and challenge grants starting in the fall of 2018. These pilots are intending to base their implementation on the IG as an official document to provide a common baseline for all activities.

In addition, there are currently ongoing pilots, who are actively started to use the IG and have started providing feedback and this can be directly captured as part of the ballot process. In addition coordination with Argonaut and the Northwestern Team implementing Questionnaires and PROs provides a good opportunity for collaboration with an existing IG that can be reviewed critically and feedback obtained and incorporated for the STU version.

All of the above activities are driven by the end date of September 2019 before which a robust IG is expected to be published that can be leveraged by PRO implementers including EHR vendors and other organizations.

When IG Proposal Is Complete

When you have completed your proposal, please send an email to FMGcontact@HL7.org

FMG Notes