Difference between revisions of "Clinical Quality Framework"
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
Bryn rhodes (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Return to [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Clinical_Quality_Information_Work_Group#CQI_Work_Group_Projects Clinical Quality Information Wiki] | Return to [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Clinical_Quality_Information_Work_Group#CQI_Work_Group_Projects Clinical Quality Information Wiki] | ||
| − | + | Participating Work Groups: | |
| + | *[[Clinical_Decision_Support_Workgroup|Clinical Decision Support Work Group]] | ||
*[[Clinical_Quality_Information_Work_Group|Clinical Quality Information Work Group]] | *[[Clinical_Quality_Information_Work_Group|Clinical Quality Information Work Group]] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
# Representation and distribution of knowledge artifacts (rules, order sets, documentation templates, measures, etc) | # Representation and distribution of knowledge artifacts (rules, order sets, documentation templates, measures, etc) | ||
| − | # | + | # Evaluation of knowledge |
==Representation== | ==Representation== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
# Metadata - Structured information about the artifact such as description, usage, evidence, stewardship, and catalog information | # Metadata - Structured information about the artifact such as description, usage, evidence, stewardship, and catalog information | ||
# Patient and Clinical Information - Data models used to represent patient and clinical information within the artifacts<br> | # Patient and Clinical Information - Data models used to represent patient and clinical information within the artifacts<br> | ||
| − | |||
# Expression Logic - Formal representation of logic involved in the artifact such as rule conditions and quality measure population criteria | # Expression Logic - Formal representation of logic involved in the artifact such as rule conditions and quality measure population criteria | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Metadata=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Harmonized metadata requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in [http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=391 Clinical Quality Common Metadata Conceptual Model]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | These metadata are realized concretely in FHIR as the initial group of elements present on all the knowledge resources. For a representative example, see the [http://hl7.org/fhir/plandefinition.html PlanDefinition] elements up to relatedArtifact. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Patient and Clinical Information=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Harmonized information model requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in [http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=378 Health Quality Improvement] (also known as Quality Improvement Domain Analysis Model, QIDAM). | ||
| + | |||
| + | These conceptual requirements are then realized as a set of FHIR Profiles in [http://hl7.org/fhir/us/qicore Quality Improvement Core (QI-Core)]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For more information on model harmonization efforts, refer to [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Harmonization_of_Health_Quality_Information_models Health Quality Information Models Activities] (Includes CMS Quality Data Model (QDM) mapping activities to QI Core). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Expression Logic=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Harmonized expression logic requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in [http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=359 Harmonization of Health Quality Artifact Reasoning and Expression Logic]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | These conceptual requirements are realized in the [http://cql.hl7.org Clinical Quality Language] specification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For more information on Clinical Quality Language, refer to the [[Clinical_Quality_Language|Clinical Quality Language]] project page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Artifact Representation=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Decision support and quality measurement artifacts can then be expressed using these components. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In FHIR, artifacts are expressed using the resources defined by the [http://hl7.org/fhir/clinicalreasoning-module.html Clinical Reasoning] module. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In addition, the [http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=337 Clinical Decision Support Knowledge Artifact Specification (KAS)] can be used to define decision support artifacts, and the [http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=97 Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF)] can be used to define quality measurement artifacts. | ||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
| − | The CDS Hooks specification provides the basis for the evaluation use case. The CQF community participates in the CDS Hooks process in pursuit of decision support evaluation use cases. | + | The [http://cds-hooks.hl7.org CDS Hooks] specification provides the basis for the evaluation use case. The CQF community participates in the CDS Hooks process in pursuit of decision support evaluation use cases. |
Revision as of 20:43, 9 April 2018
Return to Clinical Decision Support Work Group
Return to Clinical Quality Information Wiki
Participating Work Groups:
Background
The Clinical Quality Framework is a joint effort by the Clinical Decision Support and Clinical Quality Information Work Groups to identify, develop, and harmonize standards that promote integration and reuse between Clinical Decision Support (CDS) and Clinical Quality Measurement (CQM).
The effort began as a public-private initiative sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC) and has since transitioned to a joint effort within HL7 as the stewards of the specifications involved.
The effort focuses on two primary use cases:
- Representation and distribution of knowledge artifacts (rules, order sets, documentation templates, measures, etc)
- Evaluation of knowledge
Representation
For the knowledge representation use case, artifacts such as rules, order sets, and quality measures are represented using three primary components:
- Metadata - Structured information about the artifact such as description, usage, evidence, stewardship, and catalog information
- Patient and Clinical Information - Data models used to represent patient and clinical information within the artifacts
- Expression Logic - Formal representation of logic involved in the artifact such as rule conditions and quality measure population criteria
Metadata
Harmonized metadata requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in Clinical Quality Common Metadata Conceptual Model.
These metadata are realized concretely in FHIR as the initial group of elements present on all the knowledge resources. For a representative example, see the PlanDefinition elements up to relatedArtifact.
Patient and Clinical Information
Harmonized information model requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in Health Quality Improvement (also known as Quality Improvement Domain Analysis Model, QIDAM).
These conceptual requirements are then realized as a set of FHIR Profiles in Quality Improvement Core (QI-Core).
For more information on model harmonization efforts, refer to Health Quality Information Models Activities (Includes CMS Quality Data Model (QDM) mapping activities to QI Core).
Expression Logic
Harmonized expression logic requirements for decision support and quality measurement artifacts are described conceptually in Harmonization of Health Quality Artifact Reasoning and Expression Logic.
These conceptual requirements are realized in the Clinical Quality Language specification.
For more information on Clinical Quality Language, refer to the Clinical Quality Language project page.
Artifact Representation
Decision support and quality measurement artifacts can then be expressed using these components.
In FHIR, artifacts are expressed using the resources defined by the Clinical Reasoning module.
In addition, the Clinical Decision Support Knowledge Artifact Specification (KAS) can be used to define decision support artifacts, and the Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF) can be used to define quality measurement artifacts.
Evaluation
The CDS Hooks specification provides the basis for the evaluation use case. The CQF community participates in the CDS Hooks process in pursuit of decision support evaluation use cases.
