This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20170829 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)= | =ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)= | ||
| − | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#Call to order | #Call to order | ||
Latest revision as of 14:08, 30 August 2017
ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Management
- Governance
- Methodology
- ISM - Review and update ppt with artifacts mapped to the ISM
- How do we define DONE?
- What is the communication path?
- | ISM-IG-HD.pptx
- ISM - Review and update ppt with artifacts mapped to the ISM
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Meeting Information
| HL7 ARB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20170829 Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||
| Facilitator | Julian, Tony | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||
| . | Beebe, Calvin | Mayo Clinic | ||
| X | Bond,Andy | TBD | ||
| R | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||
| . | Hamm, Russell | Intelligent Medical Objects | ||
| . | Hyland, Mario | AEGIS | ||
| X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||
| X | Knapp, Paul | Pknapp Consulting | ||
| X | Kreisler, Austin | Leidos, Inc | ||
| X | Kubick, Wayne | HL7 CTO | ||
| . | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||
| X | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||
| . | McCaslin, Ken | Accenture | ||
| X | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||
| . | Smithies, Rik | HL7 UK | ||
| X | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||
| X | Kuhn, Thomson | ACP | ||
| . | ||||
| Legend | ||||
| X | Present | |||
| . | Absent | |||
| R | Regrets | |||
| Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes | ||||
Minutes
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Agenda approved by consent
- Minute Approval
- MOTION to approve the minutes (Paul/Andy S)
- Vote: (6-0-0)
- ISM - Review and update ppt with artifacts mapped to the ISM
- How do we define DONE?
- Paul: Done for now. Intention was to look at the ISM -it has value, but where and at what level of the organization? The hope is it will have value throughout the organization, but it does not have perceivable street value. Probably usable at the methodology/management product family levels. Probably not for domain level committees.
- Zoran: At the present time? Do you expect change to the TSC?
- Paul: Not put it in a vault as forever done. As domains increase in complexity due to maturation, or run into issues, this could be a useful tool.
- Paul: In the slides examples based on actual domains. We should forward to the methodology and management committees for the families to reflect on, where they can search for value.
- Paul: Take matrix from PSS into the ISM. Not purely governance-centric.
- ARB to take PSS Product matrix into the ISM. Annunciate to the SGB.
- | ISM-IG-HD.pptx
- Finalized on the slide deck.
- How do we define DONE?
- Adjournment
- Adjourned at 5:36pm Eastern
Tony Julian (talk) 10:07, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
