This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2016-10-12 Working Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
***Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana | ***Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana | ||
** Include temporal considerations? (initial evaluation of Mark's email, this seems to be outside of the scope of this project. Possibility to indicate audit of initial state of system as an option but general consensus is that this is not appropriate or persuasive for this project. Will not include this in this project.) | ** Include temporal considerations? (initial evaluation of Mark's email, this seems to be outside of the scope of this project. Possibility to indicate audit of initial state of system as an option but general consensus is that this is not appropriate or persuasive for this project. Will not include this in this project.) | ||
| − | ** Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? | + | ** Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability. |
[[Category:PASS_Audit_Working_Meeting_Minutes]] | [[Category:PASS_Audit_Working_Meeting_Minutes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 12 October 2016
Back to main PASS Audit Services page.
Agenda
- Review minutes from September 7 meeting
- Action items:
- Diana to send use case section to Chris Shawn. Done
- Chris to write the Retrieve Audit Records use case. Chris is unable to take on this task. Need someone else to take this on.
- Diana to make changes to document according to resolutions. In progress
- Discuss Mark Underwood's comments on temporal dependencies. (email sent out 9/14/2016)
- Is this in scope for this document?
- If yes, where/how is it to be included? Business requirements?
- Is this in scope for this document?
- Audit Disclosure scenarios
- Do we include these scenarios in the document?
- Mike suggests that we categorize the scenarios based on purpose of use.
- Do we include these scenarios in the document?
Minutes
Attendees
| Member | Present | Member | Present |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Proud-Madruga- SOA co-chair | x | Andrea Christenot | |
| David Silver | x | Dave Pyke | x |
| Ken Salyards | Doug Timpe | ||
| Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | Beth Pumo | ||
| Mike Davis | Mark Underwood | ||
| Richard Ettema | Mario Hyland | ||
| Kevan Riley | Chris Shawn |
Meeting summary
Action Item:
- Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30)
- 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn)
- Voting starts Dec 9
- Task list:
- Diana finish updates
- New use case written
- Insert Audit FM requirements
- Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana
- Include temporal considerations? (initial evaluation of Mark's email, this seems to be outside of the scope of this project. Possibility to indicate audit of initial state of system as an option but general consensus is that this is not appropriate or persuasive for this project. Will not include this in this project.)
- Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability.
