This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CIMI WGM Agenda May 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salon 6 & 7</td> |
<td> @ Patient Care, skin breakdown</td> | <td> @ Patient Care, skin breakdown</td> | ||
<td>Patient Care</td> | <td>Patient Care</td> | ||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q2</td> | <td>Q2</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salon Drummond Centre</td> |
<td>Argonauts</td> | <td>Argonauts</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q3</td> | <td>Q3</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salle De Bal East</td> |
<td>At Vocabulary</td> | <td>At Vocabulary</td> | ||
<td> Vocabulary </td> | <td> Vocabulary </td> | ||
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
| − | <td>& | + | <td>Salon 6 & 7</td> |
<td><font color=#c0c0c0>NOT MEETING</font> Previously scheduled with PC, EC, FHIR, Voc</td> | <td><font color=#c0c0c0>NOT MEETING</font> Previously scheduled with PC, EC, FHIR, Voc</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
| Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>Salon Hemon</td> |
<td>@ CQI</td> | <td>@ CQI</td> | ||
<td>CQI</td> | <td>CQI</td> | ||
| Line 216: | Line 216: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q2</td> | <td>Q2</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salon Hemon</td> |
<td>FHIR semantics; representing archetypes as structure definitions</td> | <td>FHIR semantics; representing archetypes as structure definitions</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
| Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
<td rowspan=2>PM </td> | <td rowspan=2>PM </td> | ||
<td>Q3</td> | <td>Q3</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salon Hemon</td> |
<td>RM (status); AML to ADL transforms (i.e., FHIM); possible RDF support</td> | <td>RM (status); AML to ADL transforms (i.e., FHIM); possible RDF support</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
| Line 237: | Line 237: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Salle De Bal East</td> |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td>CIMI</td> | <td>CIMI</td> | ||
| Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
| − | <td></td> | + | <td>Suite 701</td> |
| − | <td>@ CIC</td> | + | <td>@ CIC DAM Data Elements</td> |
<td>CIC</td> | <td>CIC</td> | ||
<td>CIMI</td> | <td>CIMI</td> | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 9 May 2016
Return to Clinical_Information_Modeling_Initiative_Work_Group main page
Agenda
| Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair | Scribe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunday May 8 |
AM | Q1 | Administration (week planning, wg health, project status updates) | |||||
| Q2 | Governance, what's in the modeling pipeline, how are models approved, what goes in the repository | Stan | ||||||
| PM | Lunch | How when and why are model transformations done (isosemantic, translation to design models) | Claude, Richard | |||||
| Q3 | Design - composition | Claude | ||||||
| Q4 | Design - Alignment with FHIM | Galen | ||||||
| Monday May 9 |
AM | Q1 | Tooling: ISAAC, IHTSDO, 'archetype design tool' | Craig, Keith, Harold, Linda | ||||
| Q2 | Semantics & alignment with models of meaning, e.g., SNOMED CT; binding; handling federated terminologies; selection of concept identifiers (e.g., LOINC vs Observable) | Jay, Claude, Keith | ||||||
| lunch | Semantics & alignment with IHTSDO | Linda | ||||||
| PM | Q3 | Quality Metrics for DCMs, incl. ISO | Sun-Ju | |||||
| Q4 | Tooling 2: SCT CIMI identifer tool, knowledge management, experimental integration with CQL | Harold, Richard | ||||||
| Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair | Scribe | |
| Tuesday May 10 |
AM | Q1 | Salon 6 & 7 | @ Patient Care, skin breakdown | Patient Care | CIMI | Jay, Susan, Harold | |
| Q2 | Salon Drummond Centre | Argonauts | Stan | |||||
| PM | lunch | No meeting. Previously CIMI meeting with FHIR Core Team | ||||||
| Q3 | Salle De Bal East | At Vocabulary | Vocabulary | CIMI | ||||
| Q4 | Salon 6 & 7 | NOT MEETING Previously scheduled with PC, EC, FHIR, Voc | ||||||
| Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair | Scribe | |
| Wednesday May 11 |
AM | Q1 | Salon Hemon | @ CQI | CQI | CIMI | Claude, Bryn, Ken | |
| Q2 | Salon Hemon | FHIR semantics; representing archetypes as structure definitions | Grahame | |||||
| PM | Q3 | Salon Hemon | RM (status); AML to ADL transforms (i.e., FHIM); possible RDF support | Michael | ||||
| Q4 | Salle De Bal East | CIMI | CQI and CDS | Claude, Bryn, Ken | ||||
| Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair | Scribe | |
| Thursday May 12 |
AM | Q1 | Suite 701 | @ CIC DAM Data Elements | CIC | CIMI | ||
| Q2 | NOT MEETING | |||||||
| PM | Q3 | NOT MEETING | ||||||
| Q4 | NOT MEETING | |||||||
| Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair | Scribe | |
| Friday May 13 |
AM | Q1 | NOT MEETING | |||||
| Q2 | NOT MEETING | |||||||
| PM | Q3 | NOT MEETING | ||||||
| Q4 | NOT MEETING |
Minutes
Sunday Q3
| HL7 CIMI Meeting Agenda/Minutes | |
| Location: Room xyz | Date: 2016-01-10 Time: 11:00 AM Central |
| Facilitator: | Note taker(s): |
| Attendee | Name, Affiliation |
| . | . |
| Quorum Requirements Met (co-chair plus 3 counting staff): | |
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Sunday Q4
Attendees Michale Van der Zel, Jay Lyle, Chris Millet, Floyd Eisenberg, Susan Matney, Craig Parker, Joey Coyle, Stan Huff, Linda Bird, Harold Solbrig, Claude Nanjo, Richard Esmond, 3-6 others
- Jay presented the FHIM at a high level, including intended uses and a brief view of the model.
- The expectation is that FHIM could provide a framework for inserting CIMI components.
- The question of composition was addressed. A CIMI indivisible model must provide the context necessary for its interpretation, so logically, a panel would contain repetitive context information, but an implementation could use pointers to avoid excessive repetition.
- We need to address the compositional dimensions Claude brings up; they seem to be orthogonal to the compositional concept of FHIM/CIMI
- Question: is this specialization or constraint? Does it matter?
- We need an approach for templating (localizing) archetypes
- Stan to provide a list of questions already identified for task force
Monday Q2
- Claude and Harold presented slides on the CQI approach to model composition and on AML representation of terminology bindings.
- Linda presented ongoing work on IHTSDO syntax development
- Jay presented slides on a project to use xslt to transform archetypes into owl xml. Questions included the following:
- Maturity of CIMI models: actually, current drafts are based on extensive harmonization, and model bindings to SCT may be incomplete but are vetted. What we are actually missing is a clear governance path so you can tell what's official and what's in process.
- Maturity of Observable model: a new version is available, or is to be available.
- Value set binding syntax: it's a URI. How this is to be resolved is the responsibility of a service, not CIMI.
- Refset bindings will require a service in order to create closure axioms for owl.
- XML version of CIMI archetypes is not normative. This one we should discuss.
