This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20160224 PLA call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{subst:: PLA Template}}") |
|||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
Agenda review | Agenda review | ||
− | *Notes of [[ | + | *Notes of [[2016-01-13_PLA_WGM_Agenda]] review |
+ | *Discussion Topics | ||
+ | **Review InM invite and discuss date | ||
+ | **Planning Guide as new product (SOA) | ||
+ | ***It is possible at some point, we will need to look at the product family process to propose additional product family. I suspect this falls into the category of support products, but it is worth exploring. I think this is a category we have not done well within the past | ||
*notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | *notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | ||
+ | *Other issues? | ||
**Level of granularity | **Level of granularity | ||
**Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced. | **Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced. |
Revision as of 18:43, 24 February 2016
return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program
HL7 PLA Call Minutes Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 985371, |
Date: 2016-mm-dd Time: 2PM | ||
Facilitator | Mary Kay/ Austin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
Calvin Beebe | |||
Woody Beeler | |||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Bo Dagnall | |||
Jean Duteau, | |||
Rick Haddorff | |||
Tony Julian | |||
Paul Knapp | |||
Austin Kreisler, | |||
Lynn Laakso | |||
Mary Kay McDaniel | |||
Brian Pech | |||
John Quinn | |||
John Roberts | |||
Andy Stechishin | |||
no quorum definition |
Agenda
Agenda review
- Notes of 2016-01-13_PLA_WGM_Agenda review
- Discussion Topics
- Review InM invite and discuss date
- Planning Guide as new product (SOA)
- It is possible at some point, we will need to look at the product family process to propose additional product family. I suspect this falls into the category of support products, but it is worth exploring. I think this is a category we have not done well within the past
- notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
- Other issues?
- Level of granularity
- Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced.
- Positioning cross-product family artifacts (standards naming)
- BAM-lite feedback and review
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
- develop form to request establishing a Product Family
Minutes
Convened
Adjourned
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved