This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent February 5, 2016"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project ==Attendees== {| class="wikitable" |- ! ||'''Member...")
 
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
* FM Response to FHIR CD proposed changes.
+
* ==Agenda==
 
+
* Reviewed FM Response to FHIR CD proposed changes.
 +
==Minutes==
 +
*Several use cases were raised to rationalize the FM response and resulted in to "friendly amendments" such as the need for more examples to illustrate somewhat opaque business requirements. E.g., to change signature cardinality to 0..*
 +
*Kathleen will take to FM as they review CPs she submitted and report back.
 +
*Meeting adjourned.
  
 
===Open===
 
===Open===

Revision as of 02:15, 6 February 2016

Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings

Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project

Attendees

Member Name x Member Name x Member Name
x Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair Kathleen Connor FM Co-Chair Tarik Idris
William Kinsley Russell McDonell x John Moehrke Security Co-Chair
Marty Prahl Diana Proud-Madruga Pat Pyette
x Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair x David Staggs Glen Marshall
Rob Horn Beth Pumo [mailto: ]

Agenda

  • ==Agenda==
  • Reviewed FM Response to FHIR CD proposed changes.

Minutes

  • Several use cases were raised to rationalize the FM response and resulted in to "friendly amendments" such as the need for more examples to illustrate somewhat opaque business requirements. E.g., to change signature cardinality to 0..*
  • Kathleen will take to FM as they review CPs she submitted and report back.
  • Meeting adjourned.

Open

  • 6285 Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) None
  • 6865 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) None
  • 7253 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 7252 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) Persuasive

Deferred until after PCD IG is written

  • 5524 Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 5525 Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 6137 Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 7532 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
  • 7533 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
  • 7871 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
  • 6284 ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related

Minutes