This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20150923 FMG concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no'''
 
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no'''
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Co chairs|| ||David Hay || ||Lloyd McKenzie
+
| Co chairs||x ||David Hay ||x ||Lloyd McKenzie
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ex-officio|| ||Woody Beeler,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||John Quinn, CTO
 
| ex-officio|| ||Woody Beeler,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||John Quinn, CTO
Line 22: Line 22:
 
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests
 
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite  || ||Paul Knapp || || Anne W., scribe
+
|Regrets || Hans Buitendijk||x ||Brian Postlethwaite  ||x||Paul Knapp ||x || Anne W., scribe
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||Josh Mandel  || ||John Moehrke|| ||Brian Pech || ||  
+
| ||Josh Mandel  || ||John Moehrke||x||Brian Pech || ||  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||  || || || || ||.||<!--guest-->
+
| ||  || || ||x || Brian Scheller
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 41: Line 41:
 
***Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call     
 
***Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call     
 
**Discussion Topics:
 
**Discussion Topics:
−
***Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to the DSTU 2 equivalent?
+
***Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to DSTU the DSTU 2 equivalent?
 
***What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
 
***What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
 
***What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
 
***What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 +
*Agenda Review:
 +
**MOTION by
 +
*Minutes from last week
 +
**MOTION by Brian Post to accept the minutes; second by Brian Pech
 +
**VOTE: all in favor
 +
*Action Items
 +
**All: Review and approve document edits and  decide on which of the FAQs and articles should get written up for inclusion on the helpdesk site
 +
***Lloyd asks the group to identify which they would like to drop.  4 FAQs and 2 articles may be dropped. Group agrees to drop articles 6 and 13. FAQs: Drop 12, 14, 22, 28
 +
***MOTION to remove the FAQs and articles mentioned above by Paul; second by Brian Post.
 +
***VOTE: Lloyd abstains; none opposed; 3 in favor
 +
**Lloyd to review DSTU QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
 +
***Add for next week
 +
**Anne to add "Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?" to 9/30 agenda so Grahame may be present
 +
***Complete
 +
**Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call
 +
***Complete and approved by TSC   
 +
*Discussion Topics:
 +
**Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to the DSTU 2 equivalent?
 +
***Lloyd feels this is a good thing to do, to point them to the current authoritative version.
 +
***Correct process  would likely be to submit a technical correction to John Quinn for approval of the change.
  
 +
 +
**What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
 +
***Two impacts of change: 1) are we doing anything that is going to mess up implementers, and 2) If we make a change to the spec that go to ballot, we must consider comments.
 +
***We could say we will allow non-substantive change; we will allow substantive change that is not in our definition of significant; furthermore, changes must be driven by quality criteria. Suggestion by Brian Post that substantive work could be done on material that is FMM 0 but all else needs to be QA based. If there is a substantial change to an element that is on track to going normative in release 3, it must come to FMG.
 +
***Lloyd to write this up for discussion in Atlanta
 +
**MOTION by Lloyd to adjourn. Adjourned at 5:32pm  Eastern
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 73: Line 99:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
−
 
 
*What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
 
*What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
 
*Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
 
*Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
 
*Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels
 
*Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels
−
 
 
[[20150930 FMG concall]]
 
[[20150930 FMG concall]]
  
Line 84: Line 108:
  
 
Back to [[FHIR_Management_Group]]
 
Back to [[FHIR_Management_Group]]
−
 
−
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International
 

Revision as of 21:33, 23 September 2015

HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/279790597
(voice and screen)

Date: 2015-09-23
Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Chair: Note taker(s): Anne W.
Quorum = chair + 4 yes/no
Co chairs x David Hay x Lloyd McKenzie
ex-officio Woody Beeler,
Dave Shaver
FGB Co-chairs		 . John Quinn, CTO
Members Members Members Observers/Guests
Regrets Hans Buitendijk x Brian Postlethwaite x Paul Knapp x Anne W., scribe
Josh Mandel John Moehrke x Brian Pech
x Brian Scheller

Agenda

  • Roll Call
  • Agenda Check
  • Minutes from 20150916_FMG_concall
  • Administrative
    • Action items
      • All: Review and approve document edits and decide on which of the FAQs and articles should get written up for inclusion on the helpdesk site
      • Lloyd to review DSTU 2 QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
      • Anne to add "Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?" to 9/30 agenda so Grahame may be present
      • Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call
    • Discussion Topics:
      • Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to DSTU the DSTU 2 equivalent?
      • What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
      • What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
      • Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
      • Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels
  • Reports
  • Process management
  • AOB (Any Other Business)

Minutes

  • Agenda Review:
    • MOTION by
  • Minutes from last week
    • MOTION by Brian Post to accept the minutes; second by Brian Pech
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Action Items
    • All: Review and approve document edits and decide on which of the FAQs and articles should get written up for inclusion on the helpdesk site
      • Lloyd asks the group to identify which they would like to drop. 4 FAQs and 2 articles may be dropped. Group agrees to drop articles 6 and 13. FAQs: Drop 12, 14, 22, 28
      • MOTION to remove the FAQs and articles mentioned above by Paul; second by Brian Post.
      • VOTE: Lloyd abstains; none opposed; 3 in favor
    • Lloyd to review DSTU QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
      • Add for next week
    • Anne to add "Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?" to 9/30 agenda so Grahame may be present
      • Complete
    • Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call
      • Complete and approved by TSC
  • Discussion Topics:
    • Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to the DSTU 2 equivalent?
      • Lloyd feels this is a good thing to do, to point them to the current authoritative version.
      • Correct process would likely be to submit a technical correction to John Quinn for approval of the change.


    • What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
      • Two impacts of change: 1) are we doing anything that is going to mess up implementers, and 2) If we make a change to the spec that go to ballot, we must consider comments.
      • We could say we will allow non-substantive change; we will allow substantive change that is not in our definition of significant; furthermore, changes must be driven by quality criteria. Suggestion by Brian Post that substantive work could be done on material that is FMM 0 but all else needs to be QA based. If there is a substantial change to an element that is on track to going normative in release 3, it must come to FMG.
      • Lloyd to write this up for discussion in Atlanta
    • MOTION by Lloyd to adjourn. Adjourned at 5:32pm Eastern

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
  • Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
  • Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels

20150930 FMG concall


Back to FHIR_Management_Group

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=20150923_FMG_concall&oldid=104584"