20150923 FMG concall

HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/279790597 (voice and screen)		Date: 2015-09-23 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Chair:		Note taker(s): Anne W.

Quorum = chair + 4			yes/no
Co chairs	x	David Hay	x	Lloyd McKenzie
ex-officio		Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs	.	John Quinn, CTO

Members		Members		Members		Observers/Guests
Regrets	Hans Buitendijk	x	Brian Postlethwaite	x	Paul Knapp	x	Anne W., scribe
	Josh Mandel		John Moehrke	x	Brian Pech
				x	Brian Scheller

Agenda

• Roll Call
• Agenda Check
• Minutes from 20150916_FMG_concall
• Administrative
  • Action items
    • All: Review and approve document edits and decide on which of the FAQs and articles should get written up for inclusion on the helpdesk site
    • Lloyd to review DSTU 2 QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
    • Anne to add "Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?" to 9/30 agenda so Grahame may be present
    • Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call
  • Discussion Topics:
    • Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to DSTU the DSTU 2 equivalent?
    • What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
    • What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
    • Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
    • Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels
• Reports
  • Connectathon management (David/Brian)
  • FGB –
  • MnM –
  • FMG Liaisons –
• Process management
  • Ballot Planning
  • Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
• AOB (Any Other Business)

Minutes

• Minutes from last week
  • MOTION by Brian Post to accept the minutes; second by Brian Pech
  • VOTE: all in favor
• Action Items
  • All: Review and approve document edits and decide on which of the FAQs and articles should get written up for inclusion on the helpdesk site
    • Lloyd asks the group to identify which they would like to drop. 4 FAQs and 2 articles may be dropped. Group agrees to drop articles 6 and 13. FAQs: Drop 12, 14, 22, 28
    • MOTION to remove the FAQs and articles mentioned above by Paul; second by Brian Post.
    • VOTE: Lloyd abstains; none opposed; 3 in favor
  • Lloyd to review DSTU QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
    • Add for next week
  • Anne to add "Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?" to 9/30 agenda so Grahame may be present
    • Complete
  • Anne to add publication request to TSC agenda for vote on call
    • Complete and approved by TSC
• Discussion Topics:
  • Should pages in DSTU 1 (and other releases) point to the DSTU 2 equivalent?
    • Lloyd feels this is a good thing to do, to point them to the current authoritative version.
    • Correct process would likely be to submit a technical correction to John Quinn for approval of the change.
  • What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
    • Two impacts of change: 1) are we doing anything that is going to mess up implementers, and 2) If we make a change to the spec that go to ballot, we must consider comments.
    • We could say we will allow non-substantive change; we will allow substantive change that is not in our definition of significant; furthermore, changes must be driven by quality criteria. Suggestion by Brian Post that substantive work could be done on material that is FMM 0 but all else needs to be QA based. If there is a substantial change to an element that is on track to going normative in release 3, it must come to FMG.
    • Lloyd to write this up for discussion in Atlanta
  • MOTION by Lloyd to adjourn. Adjourned at 5:32pm Eastern

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) Lloyd to review DSTU QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet Lloyd to write up criteria for inclusion of content into DSTU 2.1 for discussion in Atlanta

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs? Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment? Adding constraints for dropping FMM levels 20150930 FMG concall

Back to FHIR_Management_Group