This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "March 10,2015 CBCC Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 80: Line 80:
 
* Review of example consent flow diagram, updates to IG
 
* Review of example consent flow diagram, updates to IG
 
* Name Change: tentative alternative proposed for NIB: Patient Friendly Language for Healthcare Privacy and Security User Interfaces (propose that CBCC members vote on new name next CBCC meeting)
 
* Name Change: tentative alternative proposed for NIB: Patient Friendly Language for Healthcare Privacy and Security User Interfaces (propose that CBCC members vote on new name next CBCC meeting)
3.''(20 min)'' ''' Data Provenance '''-  ''TENTATIVE'' Review and vote on proposed ballot dispositions - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8519/12651/Amalgamated%20DATAPROV_R1_D1_2014SEP%2012-09.xls Proposed DPROV CDA IG dispositions as of 12-15] Comment dispositions for voters asking for in person reconciliation will be prioritized if those voters attend the call.
+
3.''(20 min)'' ''' Data Provenance '''-   
* voter name: Lisa Nelson
+
*Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8608/12941/DPROV%20Informant%20-%20LRN%20KC.pptx Proposed DPROV Informant Template]
** confirm link[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8569/12817/Amalgamated%20DATAPROV_R1_D1_2014SEP%20Jan%2020%202015.xls Jan 20th version with Lisa's comments] Need to discuss possible Informant Template
+
* Review and vote on [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8604/12934/Lisa%20Nelson%20comment%20dispositions.xlsx Proposed ballot dispositions for Lisa Nelson's comments]
* voter name: Oliver Lawless
+
* Keith Boone's comments are only remaining comments requiring "in person" reconciliation.
**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8590/12886/Amalgamated%20DATAPROV_R1_D1_2014SEP%20Feb%2024%20Oliver%20Lawless.xls Oliver's comments] Need to discuss proposed disposition updates, inclusion of Oliver's input in DSTU documentation and into any future Introductory Materials Document.
+
4. Discussion on CP 5525 - Lloyd asserts that several CA systems only store the following data elements: Patient, type, applicable period, signed date, signer, organization, text.  Since FHIR 80% Guideline is (1) a Guideline and not a "rule" for FHIR Resources, and NOT FHIR Profiles, such as the FHIR Consent Directive profile, (2) is about the data elements "exchanged", and not about the data elements persisted in several databases, is CBCC comfortable with a FHIR Consent Directive Profile that includes the data elements used in ''exchange'' that have historically been captured by HL7 v.2, v.3, CDA Consent Directive, HITSP TP 30, and which are now used for "exchange" in multiple jurisdictions?
* voter name: Keith Boone
 
4. Discussion on CP 5525
 
 
To see all the open items for Security/CBCC
 
To see all the open items for Security/CBCC
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=677&tracker_query_id=4968
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=677&tracker_query_id=4968
The specific item that is going to be most contentious is the CP 5525 where Lloyd asks us all to evaluate Contract to determine that each element in there is truly in the 80%. This is not to force us to remove items, but rather to force us to justify each item as being core to the resource. Note that a Profile can easily ADD elements it needs, just as easily as it can profile OUT items.  ''Please review ALL of the ‘follow-up’ to get background.''
 
  
 
5. (05 min)'' Action Item Review  
 
5. (05 min)'' Action Item Review  

Revision as of 17:48, 10 March 2015

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Meeting Information

Attendees

Member Name x Member Name x Member Name
x Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair . Mike Davis Security Co-Chair . Steve Eichner
x Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair . John Moehrke . Rita Torkzadeh
. Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair . Lori Simon . Paul Knapp
. Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair . Mohammed Jafari . Harry Rhodes
x Kathleen Connor . Ioana Singureanu . Tony Weida
Diana Proud-Madruga . Steve Daviss . Wende Baker
. Serafina Versaggi . Marlowe Greenberg . Chris Clark, WV
x Rick Grow . Matt Peeling . Brian Newton
x Lisa Nelson . Mike Lardiere . Amanda Nash
. Ken Salyards . Oliver Lawless .
. Neelima Chennamaraja . Susan Litton . [mailto: Bill Kinsley]
. [. Lloyd McKenzie] . [ .] . [.


Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda DRAFT

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Meeting Minutes from 03,_2015_CBCC_Conference_Call March 03 ]
  2. (25 min) Security and Privacy Patient Friendly Natural Language for Consent Directives - Update
  • Review of example consent flow diagram, updates to IG
  • Name Change: tentative alternative proposed for NIB: Patient Friendly Language for Healthcare Privacy and Security User Interfaces (propose that CBCC members vote on new name next CBCC meeting)

3.(20 min) Data Provenance -

4. Discussion on CP 5525 - Lloyd asserts that several CA systems only store the following data elements: Patient, type, applicable period, signed date, signer, organization, text. Since FHIR 80% Guideline is (1) a Guideline and not a "rule" for FHIR Resources, and NOT FHIR Profiles, such as the FHIR Consent Directive profile, (2) is about the data elements "exchanged", and not about the data elements persisted in several databases, is CBCC comfortable with a FHIR Consent Directive Profile that includes the data elements used in exchange that have historically been captured by HL7 v.2, v.3, CDA Consent Directive, HITSP TP 30, and which are now used for "exchange" in multiple jurisdictions? To see all the open items for Security/CBCC http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=677&tracker_query_id=4968

5. (05 min) Action Item Review Should CBCC defer discusion on Lloyd's objections to FHIR Consent Directive profile (Note: this is not the one approved previously by CBCC), until the approved profile has been submitted to the continuous integration build.

6. (05 min) HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Privacy Consent Directives, Release 1 - Ballot Reconciliation Update

Meeting Minutes (DRAFT)

Meeting Minutes and Agenda