This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "November 05, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 58: Line 58:
 
** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
 
** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
 
***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO
 
***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO
 +
 +
What will it mean to support more than one value?
 +
 +
Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in
  
 
'' '''DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' ''
 
'' '''DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' ''
  
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
 +
* line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's.  (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation

Revision as of 22:32, 5 November 2013

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Member Name Present Member Name Present Member Name Present
Mike Davis Security Co-chair x John Moehrke Security Co-chair Trish Williams Security Co-chair
Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair . . .
Johnathan Coleman x Kathleen Connor x Duane DeCouteau
Reed Gelzer Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair x Brian Handspicker x
Muhammed Jafari Don Jorgenson Diana Proud-Madruga x
Harry Rhodes Ioana Singureanu David Staggs
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair Tony Weida x Scott Weinstein
. .


Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
  3. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
  4. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments Security and Privacy Ontology
  5. (15 min) NIB submittal
  6. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

  1. New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen

(accepted by the review)

  • TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
  • TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
    • Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
      • there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO

What will it mean to support more than one value?

Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in

DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION

Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments

  • line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation