This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120613"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==UML Modelling Discussion== | ==UML Modelling Discussion== | ||
| − | + | *discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver | |
| − | + | *there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project | |
| − | + | *one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards | |
| − | + | *Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology | |
| − | + | *there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0 | |
==CMET Reballoting== | ==CMET Reballoting== | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 13 June 2012
M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 05/30
- UML Modelling Discussion
- CMET Reballoting
Approve Minutes from 05/30
Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0
UML Modelling Discussion
- discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver
- there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project
- one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards
- Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology
- there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0
CMET Reballoting
-there is a need to reballot the CMET sets. Currently, the intent is to reballot R3-R6 and reballot R7/R8. -Austin raised some concerns about the logistics of publishing these, especially since the older sets where Datatypes R1 -There is a concern about who will do the dispositions
