This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "February 7th, 2012 CBCC Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finaversaggi (talk | contribs) m (→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#''(15 min)'' May 2012 Ballot road map, strategy and next steps | #''(15 min)'' May 2012 Ballot road map, strategy and next steps | ||
#''(40 min)'' Jan 2012 Ballot Reconciliation | #''(40 min)'' Jan 2012 Ballot Reconciliation | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Minutes== | ||
+ | '''Roll Call, Accept Agenda''', [Accept Minutes January 31st, 2012 CBCC Conference Call] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''May 2012 Ballot road map, strategy and next steps''' | ||
+ | * Strategy - to position the BH CCD for long-term usage | ||
+ | ** With basic use cases in mind, we have identified a core set of data elements wthe the feedback received from Arizona and data requirements from Florida. Note: AZ ha 40 requirements whereas FL has approximately 100. | ||
+ | ** The data elements themselves are in the context of a model. We have identified 15 concepts that ''have'' to be exchanged i.e. job status code. | ||
+ | ** When you exchange data, it may repeat in one transmission but all the classes constitute the (single) data element. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Jan 2012 Ballot Reconciliation''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total number of Number received: | ||
+ | Comments addressed at this meeting: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Expected time to complete | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== |
Revision as of 17:30, 13 February 2012
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Accept Agenda, [Accept Minutes January 31st, 2012 CBCC Conference Call]
- (15 min) May 2012 Ballot road map, strategy and next steps
- (40 min) Jan 2012 Ballot Reconciliation
Minutes
Roll Call, Accept Agenda, [Accept Minutes January 31st, 2012 CBCC Conference Call]
May 2012 Ballot road map, strategy and next steps
- Strategy - to position the BH CCD for long-term usage
- With basic use cases in mind, we have identified a core set of data elements wthe the feedback received from Arizona and data requirements from Florida. Note: AZ ha 40 requirements whereas FL has approximately 100.
- The data elements themselves are in the context of a model. We have identified 15 concepts that have to be exchanged i.e. job status code.
- When you exchange data, it may repeat in one transmission but all the classes constitute the (single) data element.
Jan 2012 Ballot Reconciliation
Total number of Number received: Comments addressed at this meeting:
- Expected time to complete