This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Candidate Mapping Notations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
XSLT is a third possibility, but is currently not being considered as it is usually not easy to read and understand. Proprietary structure-to-structure (S2S) mapping notations, such as that in Altova’s MapForce, are not being considered because they do not support semantic mapping. | XSLT is a third possibility, but is currently not being considered as it is usually not easy to read and understand. Proprietary structure-to-structure (S2S) mapping notations, such as that in Altova’s MapForce, are not being considered because they do not support semantic mapping. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Neutral Mapping|Return to top page on mapping notations]] | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 6 June 2010
As at June 2010, two main candidate notations have been identified for evaluation:
- The OMG QVT (Query-Verify-Transform) languages, defined in the QVT Specification
- The tabular mapping notation used by the mapping and transformation tools on the HL7 GForge site
XSLT is a third possibility, but is currently not being considered as it is usually not easy to read and understand. Proprietary structure-to-structure (S2S) mapping notations, such as that in Altova’s MapForce, are not being considered because they do not support semantic mapping.
