This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-01-03 FMG concall"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | |colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Co chairs|| ||David Hay || ||Lloyd McKenzie | + | | Co chairs||X||David Hay ||X||Lloyd McKenzie |
|- | |- | ||
| ex-officio|| ||Lorraine Constable,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO | | ex-officio|| ||Lorraine Constable,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite || ||Paul Knapp || || Anne W., scribe | | || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite || ||Paul Knapp || || Anne W., scribe | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Josh Mandel || ||John Moehrke|| ||Brian Pech || || | + | |X||Josh Mandel ||X||John Moehrke||X||Brian Pech || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Grahame Grieve || || || || || | + | | ||Grahame Grieve ||X||Didi Davis ||X||Richard Ettema ||X||Sandy Vance |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
**Hans to follow up with Lorraine/Eric/Claude re: attending upcoming meeting to update on CatalogEntry in January | **Hans to follow up with Lorraine/Eric/Claude re: attending upcoming meeting to update on CatalogEntry in January | ||
*AOB (Any Other Business) | *AOB (Any Other Business) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *MOTION: to approve agenda: Lloyd/Brian Pech | ||
| + | *VOTE: 4-0-0 | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| + | *MOTION: to approve minutes of Dec. 20: Lloyd/Brian Pech | ||
| + | *VOTE: 4-0-0 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Action Items== | ||
| + | * David talked to Todd, no response. Carry over not next | ||
| + | * OccupationalDataForHealth - carry over | ||
| + | * IG proposal template changes are complete and Grahame has reviewed. Complete | ||
| + | * Artifact name algorithm proposal is complete. Will either review on today's call or next week | ||
| + | * Grahame has contacted Mary Ann and room is confirmed. Complete | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Connectathon Management== | ||
| + | * Sandy: Just under 70 registered so far. Haven't received anything yet this week. Have sent out the pre-connectathon questionnaire. Has talked with all leads and shared orientation template. | ||
| + | * Richard: Plan to do usual break-out sessions on Sat. am; Continuing to work on test scripts; Do we want to ask track leads if they need assistance?; Suggest that we add what release the track is using as part of the orientation template; ACTION: Sandy will communicate that need to the track leads | ||
| + | * David: He's put the tracking sheet together; but spreadsheet is huge; Has built an application to help manage things instead; Provided a demo of "Connectathon Manager" (http://snapp.clinfhir.com:4000/#). | ||
| + | **Lloyd: Scenarios may have multiple participants or even only one participant. David: Not sure I want to tackle that for this release | ||
| + | **Test Track Descriptions - Roles are shown as sibling of Scenarios because that's how we do it now, but they're nested under the covers | ||
| + | **Lloyd: Can we pre-load all registered attendees? David:Yes | ||
| + | **Decision - do we want to use this, old spreadsheet approach or something like IHE's Gazelle. (David hasn't had a chance to dig into the capabilities of Gazelle and how good a fit they are.) | ||
| + | * Josh: is the notion of pass/fail useful everywhere? David: some places yes, some no. Can also capture notes | ||
| + | * Richard: Can also record results using test script tool - could we integrate? | ||
| + | * Lloyd: Would be nice to be able to link to tracker items | ||
| + | * Lloyd: we need to evaluate Gazelle as to whether it's available and will meet (or be extensible to meet) our needs | ||
| + | * Lloyd: Open to the possibility of David's tool being one of the options on the table for tracks (others being spreadsheet or TestReport or nothing) | ||
| + | * John: Not sure if they'll use Gazelle this time. Richard: Gazelle has a heavy lift for setup; John: some value in being consistent - as we start getting more sophisticated, that could be more important | ||
| + | * discussion about whether track leads should do the configuration or David do it. David will do some thinking about it | ||
| + | * Decision: will let track leads decide what they want to use. Will set up a recorded gotomeeting to show to track leads. | ||
| + | |||
| + | FGB - no report | ||
| + | |||
| + | FMG - no report | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adjourned 4:57pm | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Latest revision as of 21:58, 3 January 2018
| HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2018-01-03 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
| Chair: | Note taker(s): TBD | |
| Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
| Co chairs | X | David Hay | X | Lloyd McKenzie | ||
| ex-officio | Lorraine Constable, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs |
. | Wayne Kubick, CTO | |||
| Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
| Hans Buitendijk | Brian Postlethwaite | Paul Knapp | Anne W., scribe | ||||
| X | Josh Mandel | X | John Moehrke | X | Brian Pech | ||
| Grahame Grieve | X | Didi Davis | X | Richard Ettema | X | Sandy Vance | |
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 2017-12-20_FMG_concall
- Action items
- David to tell Todd that the Devices on FHIR track will be completed by someone else if it isn't done
- OccupationalDataforHealth Resource proposal to be discussed in New Orleans
- Lloyd to update the IG proposal template to include Grahame's requirements
- Lloyd to put together a revised ballot artifact name algorithm for review
- Grahame to contact Mary Ann and Andrea with the change regarding FMG Monday lunch being replaced with committer town hall meeting
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- Parking Lot
- Josh and Grahame to document process of hosting materials for ballot review on Github
- Paul to take proposal on publishing ballot content on Github/other tools to TSC when available
- Hans to follow up with Lorraine/Eric/Claude re: attending upcoming meeting to update on CatalogEntry in January
- AOB (Any Other Business)
- MOTION: to approve agenda: Lloyd/Brian Pech
- VOTE: 4-0-0
Minutes
- MOTION: to approve minutes of Dec. 20: Lloyd/Brian Pech
- VOTE: 4-0-0
Action Items
- David talked to Todd, no response. Carry over not next
- OccupationalDataForHealth - carry over
- IG proposal template changes are complete and Grahame has reviewed. Complete
- Artifact name algorithm proposal is complete. Will either review on today's call or next week
- Grahame has contacted Mary Ann and room is confirmed. Complete
Connectathon Management
- Sandy: Just under 70 registered so far. Haven't received anything yet this week. Have sent out the pre-connectathon questionnaire. Has talked with all leads and shared orientation template.
- Richard: Plan to do usual break-out sessions on Sat. am; Continuing to work on test scripts; Do we want to ask track leads if they need assistance?; Suggest that we add what release the track is using as part of the orientation template; ACTION: Sandy will communicate that need to the track leads
- David: He's put the tracking sheet together; but spreadsheet is huge; Has built an application to help manage things instead; Provided a demo of "Connectathon Manager" (http://snapp.clinfhir.com:4000/#).
- Lloyd: Scenarios may have multiple participants or even only one participant. David: Not sure I want to tackle that for this release
- Test Track Descriptions - Roles are shown as sibling of Scenarios because that's how we do it now, but they're nested under the covers
- Lloyd: Can we pre-load all registered attendees? David:Yes
- Decision - do we want to use this, old spreadsheet approach or something like IHE's Gazelle. (David hasn't had a chance to dig into the capabilities of Gazelle and how good a fit they are.)
- Josh: is the notion of pass/fail useful everywhere? David: some places yes, some no. Can also capture notes
- Richard: Can also record results using test script tool - could we integrate?
- Lloyd: Would be nice to be able to link to tracker items
- Lloyd: we need to evaluate Gazelle as to whether it's available and will meet (or be extensible to meet) our needs
- Lloyd: Open to the possibility of David's tool being one of the options on the table for tracks (others being spreadsheet or TestReport or nothing)
- John: Not sure if they'll use Gazelle this time. Richard: Gazelle has a heavy lift for setup; John: some value in being consistent - as we start getting more sophisticated, that could be more important
- discussion about whether track leads should do the configuration or David do it. David will do some thinking about it
- Decision: will let track leads decide what they want to use. Will set up a recorded gotomeeting to show to track leads.
FGB - no report
FMG - no report
Adjourned 4:57pm
Next Steps
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International
