This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-06-21 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| || Austin Kreisler | | || Austin Kreisler | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Wayne Kubick | + | |Regrets || Wayne Kubick |
|- | |- | ||
| || Mary Kay McDaniel | | || Mary Kay McDaniel | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 21 June 2017
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2017-06-21 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Calvin Beebe | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Russ Hamm | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Austin Kreisler | |||
| Regrets | Wayne Kubick | ||
| Mary Kay McDaniel | |||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| Rik Smithies | |||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2017-06-14_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to find principles document and write precept on mixed ballot content
- Austin to update mission and charter boilerplate
- Tony to find vitality assessment slide deck
- Available here
- Paul to draft a precept on state machine alignment
- Anne to respond (copying Austin/Paul) to David Pyke re: SPIA email
- Complete
- Discussion Topics
- Review Grahme's document regarding variance from normal balloting/publishing process
- State Machine Alignment, continued
- Revisit our current precepts and add who our precepts apply to and how they are to be implemented
- Review PIC document on balloting best practices
- Parking Lot
- Review Publishing M&C updates regarding dual roles
- Write/post precept on vitality assessment
- Next steps on Substantivity (from ARB)
- How do we deal with making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching? (CIMI and Pharmacy and Lab models)
- Review Mission and Charter
- PSS approval process: managing unresponsive parties - propose new precept to TSC
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Vocabulary precepts
- General precepts
- Precept around training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ask methodology groups to define how the definition of substantive change applies to their product family; management groups must then operationalize
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
