This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2016-12-30PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | + | * Reviewed high-level CIMI model for Steve | |
| + | * Reviewed foundational requirement as above: no argument | ||
| + | * Tried to explain slide deck 2, slide 4. | ||
| + | ** Apparently this is very hard to understand. Jay will work on that. | ||
| + | ** And we need a more actionable agenda for next week. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 30 December 2016
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: Phone |
Date: 2016-12-30 Time: 10:00-11:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| Richard Esmond | PenRad | ||
| Galen Mulrooney | JP Systems | ||
| Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | ||
| Harold Solbrig | Mayo | ||
| Susan Matney | Intermountain | ||
| Joey Coyle | |||
| Gay Dolin | |||
| Ash Davison | Intermountain | ||
| Laura Heerman Langford | Intermountain | ||
| Claude Nanjo | |||
| Rob McClure | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- review principle requirement
- Be able to classify a clinical statement to support rule execution
- (e.g., "is-a chest pain finding with context = present in patient now" or "observable HbA1C > 6% OR > 42 mmol/mol with context = present in patient now")
- Suggestion that all we need to infer is the observable. Assertions should be modeled as evaluations with value = 'present' or count.
- prior thoughts on modeling semantics:
- Semantics slide 1: looking for alignment in archetype. volatile but concrete
- Semantics slide 2: stepping back. not concrete, but should be more stable.
- Be able to classify a clinical statement to support rule execution
- review ballot alignment with LOINC
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Reviewed high-level CIMI model for Steve
- Reviewed foundational requirement as above: no argument
- Tried to explain slide deck 2, slide 4.
- Apparently this is very hard to understand. Jay will work on that.
- And we need a more actionable agenda for next week.
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
