This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2016-12-30PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes ==Minutes Template== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="...") |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
### (e.g., "is-a chest pain finding with context = present in patient now" or "observable HbA1C > 6% OR > 42 mmol/mol with context = present in patient now") | ### (e.g., "is-a chest pain finding with context = present in patient now" or "observable HbA1C > 6% OR > 42 mmol/mol with context = present in patient now") | ||
## Suggestion that all we need to infer is the observable. Assertions should be modeled as evaluations with value = 'present' or count. | ## Suggestion that all we need to infer is the observable. Assertions should be modeled as evaluations with value = 'present' or count. | ||
| − | + | *[[Media:CIMIConcentricSemantics.pptx | Semantics slide 1]]: looking for alignment in archetype. volatile but concrete | |
| − | + | *[[Media:Candidate_Approach_for_Semantic_Binding.pptx | Semantics slide 2]]: stepping back. not concrete, but should be more stable. | |
# review ballot alignment with LOINC | # review ballot alignment with LOINC | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Revision as of 15:29, 29 December 2016
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: Phone |
Date: 2016-12-30 Time: 10:00-11:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| Richard Esmond | PenRad | ||
| Galen Mulrooney | JP Systems | ||
| Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | ||
| Harold Solbrig | Mayo | ||
| Susan Matney | Intermountain | ||
| Joey Coyle | |||
| Gay Dolin | |||
| Ash Davison | Intermountain | ||
| Laura Heerman Langford | Intermountain | ||
| Claude Nanjo | |||
| Rob McClure | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- review principle requirement
- Be able to classify a clinical statement to support rule execution
- (e.g., "is-a chest pain finding with context = present in patient now" or "observable HbA1C > 6% OR > 42 mmol/mol with context = present in patient now")
- Suggestion that all we need to infer is the observable. Assertions should be modeled as evaluations with value = 'present' or count.
- Be able to classify a clinical statement to support rule execution
- Semantics slide 1: looking for alignment in archetype. volatile but concrete
- Semantics slide 2: stepping back. not concrete, but should be more stable.
- review ballot alignment with LOINC
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
