Difference between revisions of "2016-01-28 Patient Care FHIR Call"
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
'''New CareTeam Resource''': PA/PC joint discussion led to a proposal to pull out Care Team into its own resource, per [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_id=677&tracker_item_id=9261| gForge 9261]. A new resource proposal is drafted [[CareTeam_FHIR_Resource_Proposal]], but some [http://lists.hl7.org/read/messages?id=286894| listserv discussion] about whether to use Group instead | '''New CareTeam Resource''': PA/PC joint discussion led to a proposal to pull out Care Team into its own resource, per [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_id=677&tracker_item_id=9261| gForge 9261]. A new resource proposal is drafted [[CareTeam_FHIR_Resource_Proposal]], but some [http://lists.hl7.org/read/messages?id=286894| listserv discussion] about whether to use Group instead | ||
* Purpose of Group is underspecified -- some think the data elements look similar, so reuse/profile it -- Lloyd expects Group is useful for research and public health where we want to treat a collection of people/animals (herd, cage, pond) -- actions are taken on the Group, but Groups don't do things, nor do they have legal responsibilities | * Purpose of Group is underspecified -- some think the data elements look similar, so reuse/profile it -- Lloyd expects Group is useful for research and public health where we want to treat a collection of people/animals (herd, cage, pond) -- actions are taken on the Group, but Groups don't do things, nor do they have legal responsibilities | ||
− | * | + | * CareTeam (as a whole) is not expected to be an actor. Rather, the individuals within the care team are the actors. |
* CareTeam is more about relationships -- not something to be acted upon | * CareTeam is more about relationships -- not something to be acted upon | ||
* More FMG discussion next week | * More FMG discussion next week |
Revision as of 22:54, 28 January 2016
Contents
Meeting Information
Patient Care FHIR Resources Conference Call Location: Conference Call |
Date: 2016-01-28 Time: 5-6:30pm ET | ||
Facilitator | Michelle M Miller | Note taker(s) | Michelle M Miller |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
Elaine Ayres | NIH/Department of Clinical Research Informatics | ||
Stephen Chu | |||
Eric Haas | Haas Consulting | ||
X | Rob Hausam | Hausam Consulting LLC | |
Laura Heermann-Langford | Intermountain Healthcare | ||
X | Emma Jones | Allscripts | |
Russ Leftwich | InterSystems | ||
Jay Lyle | Ockham Information Services LLC, VA | ||
Sarah Maulden | VA | ||
Jim McClay | Univ of Nebraska Medical Center | ||
X | Russell McDonell | Telstra Health | |
X | Lloyd McKenzie | Gevity (HL7 Canada) | |
Larry McKnight | Cerner | ||
X | Michelle M Miller | Cerner | |
Lisa Nelson | Life Over Time Solutions | ||
Viet Nguyen | Systems Made Simple | ||
X | M'Lynda Owens | ||
Craig Parker | Intermountain Healthcare | ||
Scott Robertson | Kaiser Permanente | ||
X | Simon Sum | Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics | |
Iona Thraen | Dept of Veterans Affairs | ||
X | Margaret Dittloff | ||
Quorum Requirements Met: yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Agenda review
- Approve previous meeting minutes: 2016-01-21_Patient_Care_FHIR_Call
- Motion: Rob/LLoyd Abstain - 0, Negative - 0, Approve - 5
- FHIR Maturity Model Level
- Block Vote
- Prior Action Item Follow-up
- annotation/note element name
- new note resource
- new care team resource
- negation next steps
- gForge change requests
Supporting Information
FHIR Resources owned by Patient Care
Maturity Levels
- Questionnaire (2) -- Lloyd will QA to get to 3
- Questionnaire Response (2) -- Lloyd will QA to get to 3
- Condition (2)
- AllergyIntolerance (1) -- Rob
- Procedure (1)
Connectathon candidates
- CarePlan (1)
- Goal (1)
- Referral Request (1)
- FamilyMemberHistory (1)
Lower priority resources
- Procedure Request (1)
- Flag (1)
- ClinicalImpression (0) -- goal to move to level 1 by next release
- Communication (1)
- CommunicationRequest (1)
Note: Contraindication and Risk Assessment are owned by CDS, not Patient Care
Minutes
Block Vote
Balloters
- Elliot Silver
- Eric van der Zwan
- Jesper Haffgaard
- Lloyd McKenzie
- Michele Mottini
- Michelle Miller
- Riki Merrick
- Russell McDonell
- Sean Moore
Line Items
- 9174 QuestionnaireResponse 'subject' search parameter reference types (Michele Mottini) Considered - Question Answered
- 9210 Include Dental Procedures in Procedure.Category (Sean Moore) Not Persuasive
- 8646 Change allergy criticality codes to FHIR-defined (Lloyd McKenzie) Persuasive
- 8791 AllergyIntolerance note cardinality (Michelle Miller) Persuasive
- 8984 Add category to search criteria for Procedure (Elliot Silver) Persuasive
- 9192 Questionnaire item type resource with a profile? (Eric van der Zwan) Persuasive
- 8604 FamilyMemberHistory needs explanation of how to record Patient's own history (Russell McDonell) Persuasive with Mod
- 8962 update the definition for FamilyMemberHistory.status (Riki Merrick) Persuasive with Mod
- 8963 add description how to capture statement about How many siblings, how many male siblings with condition X? (Riki Merrick) Persuasive with Mod
Pulled from block vote
- 9207 FamilyMedicalHistory does not sufficiently meet adoptive relations (Sean Moore) Not Persuasive
- 8931 Need a way to capture ruled out diagnoses (Lloyd McKenzie) Persuasive
- 8940 Goals also needs CodeableConcept as description (Jesper Haffgaard) Persuasive with Mod
Motion to approve block vote: Lloyd/Russell, abstain-1, negative-0, approval-5
Prior Action Item Follow-up
Annotation/Note element name: Michelle logged gForge 9384 for MnM to update build tool validation by renaming note element to annotation to avoid confusion with other standalone clinical notes
New Clinical Note Resource: Confirm when Grahame is available to join Patient Care FHIR conference call to continue listserv discussion related to 9304, which was a request for a new clinical note resource
New CareTeam Resource: PA/PC joint discussion led to a proposal to pull out Care Team into its own resource, per gForge 9261. A new resource proposal is drafted CareTeam_FHIR_Resource_Proposal, but some listserv discussion about whether to use Group instead
- Purpose of Group is underspecified -- some think the data elements look similar, so reuse/profile it -- Lloyd expects Group is useful for research and public health where we want to treat a collection of people/animals (herd, cage, pond) -- actions are taken on the Group, but Groups don't do things, nor do they have legal responsibilities
- CareTeam (as a whole) is not expected to be an actor. Rather, the individuals within the care team are the actors.
- CareTeam is more about relationships -- not something to be acted upon
- More FMG discussion next week
Negation: Update from Rob/Jay on whether to schedule dedicated call for negation
gForge Change Requests
Adjourn
Adjourned at <hh:mm am/pm> <timezone>.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.