This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Current Open FHIR CPs"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project November 4, 2015 *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
November 4, 2015
 
November 4, 2015
  
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5524 5524] Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
+
Ready for Discussion/Vote
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5525 5525] Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
 
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6285 6285] Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) Considered for Future Use
 
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6861 6861] 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6861 6861] 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6864 6864] 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6864 6864] 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7531 7531] 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) None
 +
 +
 +
Need a resolution, likely can get one easily
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5905 5905] Contract.binding is the same as the intent of Consent.legal (John Moehrke) Not Related
 +
** We did discuss changing the structure to an array of attachments and types (legal, readable, codeable)...
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5906 5906] Contract.signer needs to be clarified (John Moehrke) Not Related
 +
** Would be easier with the above change. Signature should be near the thing signed.
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5907 5907] Contract.action is not defined (John Moehrke) Not Related
 +
** I really don't understand contract.action. The valueset given is totally useless.
 +
 +
 +
Material to make Examples. Examples preparing us for Profiling and/or Implementation Guide writing
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6285 6285] Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6865 6865] 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6865 6865] 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7252 7252] 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7252 7252] 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7253 7253] 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7253 7253] 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7531 7531] 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) None
 
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7532 7532] 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7532 7532] 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7533 7533] 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6137 6137] Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) Not Related
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7691 7691] 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu) Not Related
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Topic of simplifying Consent/Contract. We choose to defer until we can prove our original model.
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7871 7871] 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7871 7871] 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5905 5905] Contract.binding is the same as the intent of Consent.legal (John Moehrke) Not Related
 
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5906 5906] Contract.signer needs to be clarified (John Moehrke) Not Related
 
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5907 5907] Contract.action is not defined (John Moehrke) Not Related
 
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6137 6137] Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) Not Related
 
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6284 6284] ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6284 6284] ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7691 7691] 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu) Not Related
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5524 5524] Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
−
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7752 7752] 2015May core #1073 - Replace value set with FHIR Signer Type value set (Kathleen Connor) Not Related
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5525 5525] Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7770 7770] 2015May core #1091 - Rename Contract - Consent is not a Contract (Keith Boone) Not Related
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7770 7770] 2015May core #1091 - Rename Contract - Consent is not a Contract (Keith Boone) Not Related
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7533 7533] 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7771 7771] 2015May core #1092 - Does electronic exchange of contracts fit in the 80%? (Keith Boone) Not Related
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7771 7771] 2015May core #1092 - Does electronic exchange of contracts fit in the 80%? (Keith Boone) Not Related

Revision as of 21:59, 11 November 2015

Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project

November 4, 2015

Ready for Discussion/Vote

  • 6861 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
  • 6864 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
  • 7531 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) None


Need a resolution, likely can get one easily

  • 5905 Contract.binding is the same as the intent of Consent.legal (John Moehrke) Not Related
    • We did discuss changing the structure to an array of attachments and types (legal, readable, codeable)...
  • 5906 Contract.signer needs to be clarified (John Moehrke) Not Related
    • Would be easier with the above change. Signature should be near the thing signed.
  • 5907 Contract.action is not defined (John Moehrke) Not Related
    • I really don't understand contract.action. The valueset given is totally useless.


Material to make Examples. Examples preparing us for Profiling and/or Implementation Guide writing

  • 6285 Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) Considered for Future Use
  • 6865 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
  • 7252 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 7253 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
  • 7532 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
  • 6137 Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) Not Related
  • 7691 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu) Not Related


Topic of simplifying Consent/Contract. We choose to defer until we can prove our original model.

  • 7871 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
  • 6284 ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related
  • 5524 Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
  • 5525 Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
  • 7770 2015May core #1091 - Rename Contract - Consent is not a Contract (Keith Boone) Not Related
  • 7533 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
  • 7771 2015May core #1092 - Does electronic exchange of contracts fit in the 80%? (Keith Boone) Not Related
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Current_Open_FHIR_CPs&oldid=107317"