Current Open FHIR CPs

Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project

November 11, 2015

Ready for Discussion/Vote

• 6861 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
• 6864 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
• 7531 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) None

Need a resolution, likely can get one easily

• 5905 Contract.binding is the same as the intent of Consent.legal (John Moehrke) Not Related
  • We did discuss changing the structure to an array of attachments and types (legal, readable, codeable)...
• 5906 Contract.signer needs to be clarified (John Moehrke) Not Related
  • Would be easier with the above change. Signature should be near the thing signed.
• 5907 Contract.action is not defined (John Moehrke) Not Related
  • I really don't understand contract.action. The valueset given is totally useless.

Material to make Examples. Examples preparing us for Profiling and/or Implementation Guide writing

• 6285 Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) Considered for Future Use
• 6865 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
• 7252 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) None
• 7253 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
• 7532 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
• 6137 Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) Not Related
• 7691 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu) Not Related

Topic of simplifying Consent/Contract. We choose to defer until we can prove our original model.

• 7871 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
• 6284 ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related
• 5524 Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
• 5525 Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
• 7770 2015May core #1091 - Rename Contract - Consent is not a Contract (Keith Boone) Not Related
• 7533 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
• 7771 2015May core #1092 - Does electronic exchange of contracts fit in the 80%? (Keith Boone) Not Related