This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Relevant and Pertinent"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
=Reference Materials=
 
=Reference Materials=
 
[[Beacon Community EHR Affinity Domain]]
 
[[Beacon Community EHR Affinity Domain]]
 +
=Initial Communication Draft=
 +
Dear [NAME]
 +
As part of the HL7 drive to enhance global health data interoperability, the Structured Documents workgroup, in partnership with Clinical Interoperability Council and Patient Care workgroups, have launched a project to help reduce the information overload that can result from excessive detail in CCD/C-CDA document implementations as needed for meaningful use requirements.
 +
 +
This project’s aim is to identify the most relevant administrative, demographic, and clinical information facts about a patient's healthcare, covering one or more healthcare encounters allowing one healthcare practitioner, system, or setting to aggregate all of the pertinent data about a patient in the most efficient way possible.
 +
To accomplish this, we are conducting a study with practitioners and professional association members to identify what they believe is the more relevant and pertinent set of information that they would need for a health care encounter.  This gathered information will help the project create potential rules for what should be included in a response for healthcare information.
 +
 +
We would like your assistance in this endeavor.  We would like to meet virtually to describe the purpose of the project and explain how to complete the survey. If you are then interested we would like you fill out a short questionnaire regarding what you feel are the most relevant and pertinent details you need in your encounters, this would help us help the healthcare industry.  We would then like to follow up in another virtual meeting refine and clarify the feedback we've collected.
 +
 +
Please let us know if you will be able to help us help.
 +
 +
Sincerely,
 +
[SOMEBODY OF AUTHORITY]

Revision as of 18:23, 17 June 2015

Meetings

Presentation Review

The initial presentation to explain the project is here File:RnP.pptx

Questions to Address

Insert your page listing questions to ask here! Then add your questions to that page. That way, people can provide different approaches without necessarily being influenced by what others have already done.

Keith's RnP Questions
George's RnP Questions
David's RnP Questions
Emma's RnP Questions

Review of Questions (June 10th)

First Draft of Questionnaire

Reference Materials

Beacon Community EHR Affinity Domain

Initial Communication Draft

Dear [NAME] As part of the HL7 drive to enhance global health data interoperability, the Structured Documents workgroup, in partnership with Clinical Interoperability Council and Patient Care workgroups, have launched a project to help reduce the information overload that can result from excessive detail in CCD/C-CDA document implementations as needed for meaningful use requirements.

This project’s aim is to identify the most relevant administrative, demographic, and clinical information facts about a patient's healthcare, covering one or more healthcare encounters allowing one healthcare practitioner, system, or setting to aggregate all of the pertinent data about a patient in the most efficient way possible. To accomplish this, we are conducting a study with practitioners and professional association members to identify what they believe is the more relevant and pertinent set of information that they would need for a health care encounter. This gathered information will help the project create potential rules for what should be included in a response for healthcare information.

We would like your assistance in this endeavor. We would like to meet virtually to describe the purpose of the project and explain how to complete the survey. If you are then interested we would like you fill out a short questionnaire regarding what you feel are the most relevant and pertinent details you need in your encounters, this would help us help the healthcare industry. We would then like to follow up in another virtual meeting refine and clarify the feedback we've collected.

Please let us know if you will be able to help us help.

Sincerely, [SOMEBODY OF AUTHORITY]