Difference between revisions of "Clinicians on FHIR"
StephenChu (talk | contribs) |
StephenChu (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<br> * [[Clinical Assessment]] | <br> * [[Clinical Assessment]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
Topics of Interest: | Topics of Interest: | ||
<br> * [[Observation vs Condition]] | <br> * [[Observation vs Condition]] |
Revision as of 05:33, 28 May 2015
Return to: Patient Care
Return to: FHIR Clinical Resources - PCWG
Contents
Background, Objectives and Evolution
Histoy
In 2013, a set of FHIR clinical resources were developed by the FHIR team with some inputs from the Patient Care WG members
Unfortunately, PCWG members and leadership team were fully consumed by a number of PCWG projects and did not have sufficient time to provide adequate inputs that can do the clinical resources justice
Consequently, extensive debates had taken place during and after the first FHIR DSTU ballot. There are obvious harmonization issues between the technical and clinical view points/perspectives
In addition to the commitments by both the FHIR team and PCWG members to review and enhance/improve the FHIR DSTU1 Clinical Resources, it is agreed that better clinical engagements are highly desirable and beneficial to progressing the FHIR clinical resources toward DSTU2
At the May 2014 (Phoenix) WGM, the FHIR team approached PCWG leadership team to discuss the idea of a clinical connectathon. It was emphasized that this would be very different from the technical connectathon in which the participants focus solely on the technical aspect of interoperability. The clinical connectathon will be focused on clinical interoperability
Post May 2015 Paris WGM Decision
The objectives/purposes of the Clinician Connectathon were revisited during the May 2015 WGM.
The consensus was that these events were not actually connectathon in the similar way to the technical FHIR connectathon events.
The set of key objectives established since the first event in May 2014 WGM were re-examined. It was agreed that these objectives are still valid and accurately reflect the purposes of the events:
- - to test the accuracy, validity and usability of clinical resources
- - to identify any issues arising from clinical use of clinical resources tested
- - to provide recommendations to enhance/improve the clinical resources tested
- - to identify lessons learnt such that future FHIR resources development methodology and processes may be improved
Based on the re-examination of the purposes, it was agreed that a more appropriate concept should replace the current clinician connectathon concept moving forward.
The consensus was that Clinicians on FHIR is best suited to the intended purposes.
Owning Committee/Workgroup
Leadership
- Clinical Leaders
- Elaine Ayres
- Stephen Chu
- Russ Leftwich
- Laura Heermann-Langford
- Emma Jones
- FHIR Liaisons
- David Hay
- Viet Nguyen
- Lloyd McKenzie
Events
- Clinicians on FHIR 2025 (renamed from Clinician Connectathon post May 2015 Paris WGM)
- Clinician Connectathon 2015 (January 2015 and May 2015 WGM events)
Useful Resources
Key links for Clinicians on FHIR
* Referral and Transition/Transfer of Care
* Clinical Assessment
Topics of Interest:
* Observation vs Condition
* Observation, Clinical Assessment and Clinical Annotation
Storyboards
Other References and Resources
- Clinical Scenarios analysis:
- - Chronic Care
- - Acute Care
- - Adverse Reaction
- - summary of 3 chosen scenarios
- - Nutrition Assessment
- Care Plan for Immunization:
- http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/29/profiling-a-fhir-careplan-for-immunizations/
- http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/30/profiling-a-fhir-careplan-for-immunizations-part-2/
- http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/25/using-fhir-to-record-immunizations/