This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120613"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | =M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | ||
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | [[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | ||
| + | ==Attendees== | ||
| + | Hamill, Beeler, Hausam, Pech, Loyd, Kreisler, Duteau | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120530| Minutes Prior Meeting on 05/30]] | *Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120530| Minutes Prior Meeting on 05/30]] | ||
*UML Modelling Discussion | *UML Modelling Discussion | ||
*CMET Reballoting | *CMET Reballoting | ||
| + | *Harmonization Update | ||
| − | ==Approve Minutes from 05/30= | + | ==Approve Minutes from 05/30== |
Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0 | Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0 | ||
==UML Modelling Discussion== | ==UML Modelling Discussion== | ||
| − | + | *discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver | |
| − | + | *there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project | |
| − | + | *one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards | |
| − | + | *Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology | |
| − | + | *there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0 | |
==CMET Reballoting== | ==CMET Reballoting== | ||
| − | + | *there is a need to reballot the CMET sets. Currently, the intent is to reballot R3-R6 and reballot R7/R8. | |
| − | + | *Austin raised some concerns about the logistics of publishing these, especially since the older sets were Datatypes R1 | |
| − | + | *There is a concern about who will do the dispositions and how this will be reballoted | |
| + | *Due to the discussion, this topic was deferred to next week's meeting to resolve some of the concerns. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Harmonization Update== | ||
| + | *The preview package of harmonization proposals is in-progress. | ||
| + | *It will be out for technical review for next week | ||
==Adjournment== | ==Adjournment== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 20 June 2012
M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Attendees
Hamill, Beeler, Hausam, Pech, Loyd, Kreisler, Duteau
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 05/30
- UML Modelling Discussion
- CMET Reballoting
- Harmonization Update
Approve Minutes from 05/30
Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0
UML Modelling Discussion
- discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver
- there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project
- one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards
- Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology
- there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0
CMET Reballoting
- there is a need to reballot the CMET sets. Currently, the intent is to reballot R3-R6 and reballot R7/R8.
- Austin raised some concerns about the logistics of publishing these, especially since the older sets were Datatypes R1
- There is a concern about who will do the dispositions and how this will be reballoted
- Due to the discussion, this topic was deferred to next week's meeting to resolve some of the concerns.
Harmonization Update
- The preview package of harmonization proposals is in-progress.
- It will be out for technical review for next week
