This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120613"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes]]
<!--
 
  EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes:
 
  1) Delete the string "|Agenda Template" from   
 
        [[Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Agenda Template]] below
 
  2) Delete the Logistics template reference
 
        {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}}  below
 
-->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Agenda Template]]
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
 
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
{{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}}
 
 
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]]
 
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]]
 +
==Attendees==
 +
Hamill, Beeler, Hausam, Pech, Loyd, Kreisler, Duteau
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_yyyymmdd| Minutes Prior Meeting on mm/dd]]
+
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120530| Minutes Prior Meeting on 05/30]]
 +
*UML Modelling Discussion
 +
*CMET Reballoting
 +
*Harmonization Update
 +
 
 +
==Approve Minutes from 05/30==
 +
Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0
  
==Agenda Item 1==
+
==UML Modelling Discussion==
Goes here
+
*discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver
 +
*there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project
 +
*one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards
 +
*Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology
 +
*there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0
  
==Agenda Item 1==
+
==CMET Reballoting==
Goes here
+
*there is a need to reballot the CMET sets.  Currently, the intent is to reballot R3-R6 and reballot R7/R8.
 +
*Austin raised some concerns about the logistics of publishing these, especially since the older sets were Datatypes R1
 +
*There is a concern about who will do the dispositions and how this will be reballoted
 +
*Due to the discussion, this topic was deferred to next week's meeting to resolve some of the concerns.
  
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
+
==Harmonization Update==
 +
*The preview package of harmonization proposals is in-progress.
 +
*It will be out for technical review for next week
  
 
==Adjournment==
 
==Adjournment==

Latest revision as of 20:10, 20 June 2012


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Attendees

Hamill, Beeler, Hausam, Pech, Loyd, Kreisler, Duteau

Agenda

Approve Minutes from 05/30

Motion: Austin/Patrick, 4-0-0

UML Modelling Discussion

  • discussed the UML Modeling BoF that occurred in Vancouver
  • there is a tie-in with the tooling MAX project
  • one of the concerns is with various workgroups, i.e. Patient Care, creating independent UML modelling standards
  • Patrick will create a project scope statement to bring UML modelling into the methodology
  • there was a desire for a UML Modeling mailing list created by the MnM group. Motion to create: Patrick/Jean, 4-0-0

CMET Reballoting

  • there is a need to reballot the CMET sets. Currently, the intent is to reballot R3-R6 and reballot R7/R8.
  • Austin raised some concerns about the logistics of publishing these, especially since the older sets were Datatypes R1
  • There is a concern about who will do the dispositions and how this will be reballoted
  • Due to the discussion, this topic was deferred to next week's meeting to resolve some of the concerns.

Harmonization Update

  • The preview package of harmonization proposals is in-progress.
  • It will be out for technical review for next week

Adjournment