This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20120322 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Minutes) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#Call to order | #Call to order | ||
Line 110: | Line 98: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
− | + | #Agenda Approval | |
− | + | ## The agenda was approved as modified by affirmation. | |
+ | #Minute Approval March 8, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve) | ||
+ | ##'''Motion''' to approve the March 8, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve) | ||
+ | ##'''Vote'''(7-0-0) | ||
+ | #Minute Approval March 15, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve) | ||
+ | ##'''Motion''' to approve the March 15, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve) | ||
+ | ##'''Vote'''(6-0-1) | ||
+ | #Report from TSC RE SAIF-CD publishing schedule | ||
+ | ##Charlie Mead: The Deadline for Normative edition is April 15. We are working around May 1 for SAIF-CD. | ||
+ | ##HL7 will publish the SAIF-CD on the HL7 web site. | ||
+ | ##We could publish in the NE, it is currently NOT on the list, but could be. ArB needs to decide. ##With our current deadline, it will be published. | ||
+ | ##Cecil said he could have his re-writes done by April 15. Bo and Charlie are finishing the intro. | ||
+ | ###'''Motion''' To publish as DSTU, and not request addition to the Normative Edition.(Tony/Charlie) | ||
+ | ###'''Vote''' (7-0-0) | ||
+ | #A SAIF Reference Case Study | ||
+ | ##Ron: There were only 5 in san-antonio. | ||
+ | ##Ron:TSC is deciding on whether to provide tutorials to Co-Chairs free of charge. | ||
+ | ##Ron:We need case study(s) to provide context to the tutorial attendees. | ||
+ | ###Use case should be generic enough to apply to all | ||
+ | ###Organizations in different roles | ||
+ | ###Charlie: Does that not start with each having their own SAIF-IG? | ||
+ | ###Ron: Needs to describe the IG, how to compare the context(s), and the roles of each. Meta-level story. | ||
+ | ###Charlie:Valuable - fills in blanks for multiple organizations. When NCI adopted SAIF they created their IG so that the decisions made would not be in the code - at a level other than run-time. | ||
+ | ###Ron: I absolutely need to put past Patrick, vendor, and customer. I cant see adding more than ten slides with the study. Need collaborateion from Steve and Charlie. | ||
+ | ###Jane: The mobile health scenario would be helpful - targeting a new audience -whose current understanding of HL7 is different - Talk about interoperability in different terms. | ||
+ | ##Ron will ping Steve and Charlie - Bo would like to contribute. | ||
+ | #Report from Patrick? | ||
+ | #DAM issue Informative or DSTU? | ||
+ | ##Ron: Can we do it in a call? | ||
+ | ##Charlie: We can do it in a three hour call. | ||
+ | ##Jane: Extend our current Call? | ||
+ | ##Charlie: Could Zoran and Andy do 6-9am? | ||
+ | ##Andy: Yes | ||
+ | ##Charlie: AMS gave us his tutorial on Domain Modeling and DAMs. It is 3 hours. It can be boiled down to a few key points | ||
+ | ###Definition | ||
+ | ###Static Semantics | ||
+ | ###Dynamic Semantics | ||
+ | ##If we started with that, and enhanced it, being explicit about what is | ||
+ | ###Required | ||
+ | ###Optional | ||
+ | ###Inappropriate | ||
+ | ##Jane: What is the relationship between the DAM and other standards. | ||
+ | ##Charlie: TSC was concerned about Conceptual/Logical, since it depends on the binding. Based on the definition, the TSC could determine what is informative/normative. | ||
+ | #Risk management co-sponsor | ||
+ | ##'''Motion''' ArB formally co-sponsor the architecture program project for risk assessment and Governance issue.(Jane/Charlie) | ||
+ | ###Wendell: What do we need to do if the motion passed? | ||
+ | ###Jane: The group will work out and present to the TSC the results, but we would like the ArB to ba available for consultation before taking to TSC. | ||
+ | ###Charlie: Formal strategy? | ||
+ | ###Jane: Strategy currently in use. | ||
+ | ###Charlie: I will send the NCI Risk Assessment profile methodology. | ||
+ | ###Jane: It is filling in the RISK profile: Nature, Probability, Impact, Mitigation. | ||
+ | ###Charlie: That is good. | ||
+ | ###Jane: Looking at the processes in place. | ||
+ | ##Ron: ArB will have opportunity to shape as they work throught the strategy. | ||
+ | ##Charlie: Is their methodology robust? Is it expressed in the Governance profile at the appropriate level? | ||
+ | ##Jane: I used examples of governance processes in place, and we will use an inventory of what there is. | ||
+ | ##Charlie:In the 3 hour overview of the 3 day governance class will get, is the 3 day curriculum - a lot at the specifics level may not be relative. The 3hour tutorial will help shape the requirements for HL7. | ||
+ | ##Jane: It does not map well to HL7 space. | ||
+ | ##Charlie: I have told Thomas that SOA is not the world and will help with the mapping. | ||
+ | ##Jane: Reverse engineering excercise. | ||
+ | ##'''Vote'''(8-0-0) | ||
+ | #SAIF-CD | ||
+ | ##Charlie: We should say we will send to the membership of the ArB the revised version, so we will have a week to work on, to get to the TSC by May 1. | ||
+ | #Glossary | ||
+ | #Other Business and Planning | ||
+ | ##Prep for April 12 Call on next weeks agenda. | ||
+ | #Adournment | ||
+ | Adjourned at 5:05 U.S. Eastern | ||
[[Category:Arb Minutes]] | [[Category:Arb Minutes]] |
Latest revision as of 21:53, 22 March 2012
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Agenda Approval
- Minute Approval March 8, 2012 Minutes
- Minute Approval March 15, 2012 Minutes
- Report from TSC RE SAIF-CD publishing schedule
- a SAIF Reference Case Study
- Report from Patrick?
- CIC group question
- What is a DAM.
- co-sponsor motion
- Glossary
- Other Business and Planning
- Adournment
Meeting Information
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20120322 Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||||
Facilitator | Charlie Mead/ Parker, Ron | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |||
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||||
X | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||||
. | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||||
X | Curry, Jane | Health Information Strategies | ||||
X | Dagnall, Bo | HP Enterprise Services | ||||
. | Grieve, Grahame | Health Intersections Pty Ltd | ||||
X | Hufnagel, Steve | U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | ||||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||||
. | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||||
. | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||||
X | Mead, Charlie | National Cancer Institute | ||||
X | Milosevic, Zoran | NEHTA | ||||
X | Ocasio, Wendell | Agilex Technologies | ||||
X | Parker, Ron | CA Infoway | ||||
. | Quinn, John | Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||||
. | Guests | |||||
X | Luthra, Anil | NCI | ||||
. | Legend | |||||
. | Present | |||||
. | Absent | |||||
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes |
Minutes
- Agenda Approval
- The agenda was approved as modified by affirmation.
- Minute Approval March 8, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve)
- Motion to approve the March 8, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve)
- Vote(7-0-0)
- Minute Approval March 15, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve)
- Motion to approve the March 15, 2012 Minutes (Charlie/Steve)
- Vote(6-0-1)
- Report from TSC RE SAIF-CD publishing schedule
- Charlie Mead: The Deadline for Normative edition is April 15. We are working around May 1 for SAIF-CD.
- HL7 will publish the SAIF-CD on the HL7 web site.
- We could publish in the NE, it is currently NOT on the list, but could be. ArB needs to decide. ##With our current deadline, it will be published.
- Cecil said he could have his re-writes done by April 15. Bo and Charlie are finishing the intro.
- Motion To publish as DSTU, and not request addition to the Normative Edition.(Tony/Charlie)
- Vote (7-0-0)
- A SAIF Reference Case Study
- Ron: There were only 5 in san-antonio.
- Ron:TSC is deciding on whether to provide tutorials to Co-Chairs free of charge.
- Ron:We need case study(s) to provide context to the tutorial attendees.
- Use case should be generic enough to apply to all
- Organizations in different roles
- Charlie: Does that not start with each having their own SAIF-IG?
- Ron: Needs to describe the IG, how to compare the context(s), and the roles of each. Meta-level story.
- Charlie:Valuable - fills in blanks for multiple organizations. When NCI adopted SAIF they created their IG so that the decisions made would not be in the code - at a level other than run-time.
- Ron: I absolutely need to put past Patrick, vendor, and customer. I cant see adding more than ten slides with the study. Need collaborateion from Steve and Charlie.
- Jane: The mobile health scenario would be helpful - targeting a new audience -whose current understanding of HL7 is different - Talk about interoperability in different terms.
- Ron will ping Steve and Charlie - Bo would like to contribute.
- Report from Patrick?
- DAM issue Informative or DSTU?
- Ron: Can we do it in a call?
- Charlie: We can do it in a three hour call.
- Jane: Extend our current Call?
- Charlie: Could Zoran and Andy do 6-9am?
- Andy: Yes
- Charlie: AMS gave us his tutorial on Domain Modeling and DAMs. It is 3 hours. It can be boiled down to a few key points
- Definition
- Static Semantics
- Dynamic Semantics
- If we started with that, and enhanced it, being explicit about what is
- Required
- Optional
- Inappropriate
- Jane: What is the relationship between the DAM and other standards.
- Charlie: TSC was concerned about Conceptual/Logical, since it depends on the binding. Based on the definition, the TSC could determine what is informative/normative.
- Risk management co-sponsor
- Motion ArB formally co-sponsor the architecture program project for risk assessment and Governance issue.(Jane/Charlie)
- Wendell: What do we need to do if the motion passed?
- Jane: The group will work out and present to the TSC the results, but we would like the ArB to ba available for consultation before taking to TSC.
- Charlie: Formal strategy?
- Jane: Strategy currently in use.
- Charlie: I will send the NCI Risk Assessment profile methodology.
- Jane: It is filling in the RISK profile: Nature, Probability, Impact, Mitigation.
- Charlie: That is good.
- Jane: Looking at the processes in place.
- Ron: ArB will have opportunity to shape as they work throught the strategy.
- Charlie: Is their methodology robust? Is it expressed in the Governance profile at the appropriate level?
- Jane: I used examples of governance processes in place, and we will use an inventory of what there is.
- Charlie:In the 3 hour overview of the 3 day governance class will get, is the 3 day curriculum - a lot at the specifics level may not be relative. The 3hour tutorial will help shape the requirements for HL7.
- Jane: It does not map well to HL7 space.
- Charlie: I have told Thomas that SOA is not the world and will help with the mapping.
- Jane: Reverse engineering excercise.
- Vote(8-0-0)
- Motion ArB formally co-sponsor the architecture program project for risk assessment and Governance issue.(Jane/Charlie)
- SAIF-CD
- Charlie: We should say we will send to the membership of the ArB the revised version, so we will have a week to work on, to get to the TSC by May 1.
- Glossary
- Other Business and Planning
- Prep for April 12 Call on next weeks agenda.
- Adournment
Adjourned at 5:05 U.S. Eastern