This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR056-688 Root cause reissued report (OBX)"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OO Open Change Requests}}
+
{{OO Accepted Change Requests}}
{{OO Open V2.8 Change Requests}}
+
{{OO Accepted V2.8 Change Requests}}
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
  

Latest revision as of 14:59, 16 May 2011

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Freida Hall / Ken McCaslin Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: May 5, 2011 Change request ID: OO CR056
Standard/IG: 2.8 Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

See 2.8 change request File:OO CR056-688.doc for problem definition and proposal.

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

16-May-2011

  • Should analyzer/instrumentation be under Information Technology? User defined, so doesn't have to be.
  • Concern with Vendor - Re-Agent could be contaminated all along the suppply line. Wouldn't Re-Agent as root cause be better.
  • Intend to remove the comments.
  • Suggest to change V to AP (Analysis Process) to avoid interpretation that Vendor is root cause rather than re-agent, instrumentation etc.
  • Suggest to change I to IM (Information Management) to closer align with IHE distinction. Includes both sender and receiver.
  • Suggest to change C to PD (Placer Data) and adjust the intro that this is data provided by the placer that somehow changed causing a new result/test to be reported/calculated/performed.
  • Motion to accept with amendments to change V to AP, I to IM, C to PD. Ken McCaslin, Patrick Loyd.
    • Based on suggestions ACLA may further refine the names.
    • Against: 0; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 7