Difference between revisions of "2011-01-12 PA WGM Minutes"
m (→Wednesday Q2) |
|||
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!-- ******** CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES *******************--> | <!-- ******** CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES *******************--> | ||
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | | width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | ||
− | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"| | + | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"| Irma Jongeneel |
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker''' | | width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker''' | ||
− | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"| | + | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"| Alex de Leon |
|- | |- | ||
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | | border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| . || Sasha Bojicic | | . || Sasha Bojicic | ||
|colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | |colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Ron Parker | | . || Ron Parker | ||
|colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | |colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Rene Spronk | | . || Rene Spronk | ||
|colspan="2"| HL7 Netherlands | |colspan="2"| HL7 Netherlands | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | . || | + | | . || Corinne Gower |
− | |colspan="2"| | + | |colspan="2"| HL7 New Zealand |
|- | |- | ||
Line 97: | Line 85: | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | ||
− | # | + | #V3 Work - Interdependent Registries |
− | |||
'''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | '''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | ||
− | + | <<insert slide deck here>> | |
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Line 115: | Line 102: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | Sasha and Ron from Canada Infoway presented a slide deck for Interdependent Registries and reviewed the significant investments being made and support being received in the Canadian realm. This slide deck covered these subjects: | |
+ | * What is the role of the registry | ||
+ | * EHRS Registry Types | ||
+ | * Why Interdependent Registries | ||
+ | * Concept of Identity Management vs Registry | ||
+ | * Examples of Interdependent | ||
+ | |||
+ | They discussed the anticipated set of registry components to manage information of the key business entities that define the process of health care delivery. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Initially, four registries were introduced Client, Provider, Location, Terminology later, the following is the final set of registries within Blueprint for 2015: | ||
+ | * Client | ||
+ | * Organization | ||
+ | * Provider | ||
+ | * Application | ||
+ | * Location | ||
+ | * User | ||
+ | * Health Service | ||
+ | * Health program | ||
+ | * Relationship Management Services | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Person registry has been deliberately left out due to the problems with where this might be relegated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The WG discussed the concept of location and the various definitions based on context (patient location, provider service location, specialty location). This underscored the need to socialize these concepts to the larger PA audience so that they may examine the various registries to define appropriate use cases, examples, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Canada Infoway is putting forth that the following are needed to move forward: | ||
+ | * Service Interfaces | ||
+ | * Data Elements | ||
+ | * HL7 Ineraction messages | ||
+ | |||
+ | The WG put forth that requirements would be needed to support these items. Canada Infoway is prepared to develop use cases to help define the requirements. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Line 147: | Line 163: | ||
*. | *. | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
==Wednesday Q2== | ==Wednesday Q2== | ||
Line 198: | Line 213: | ||
| . || Sasha Bojicic | | . || Sasha Bojicic | ||
|colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | |colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Wendy Huang | | . || Wendy Huang | ||
Line 210: | Line 222: | ||
| . || Ron Parker | | . || Ron Parker | ||
|colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | |colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Rene Spronk | | . || Rene Spronk | ||
|colspan="2"| HL7 Netherlands | |colspan="2"| HL7 Netherlands | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | |colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
Line 245: | Line 244: | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | ||
− | #V3 - | + | #V3 - Interdependent Registries |
− | |||
'''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | '''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | ||
Line 263: | Line 261: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | 1. The WG discussed the goal for PA regarding interdependent registries. We should have fairly well defined requirements for interdependent registries for inclusion into the next ballot cycle. | + | 1. The WG discussed the goal for PA regarding interdependent registries. We should have fairly well defined requirements for interdependent registries for inclusion into the next ballot cycle. |
+ | |||
2. The WG then continued with the use cases for interdependent registries from Canada Infoway. | 2. The WG then continued with the use cases for interdependent registries from Canada Infoway. | ||
− | + | ||
Within the discussions, the WG considered some interdependency business requirements that arose as a result of the review of the eReferral use cases from Canada: | Within the discussions, the WG considered some interdependency business requirements that arose as a result of the review of the eReferral use cases from Canada: | ||
− | + | * Health Service Type – This may be covered in provider | |
− | + | * Provider – This information is most likely covered in the Provider Registry Topic | |
− | + | * Location – This needed information may be covered in the Service Delivery Location Topic | |
− | + | * Organization – This information may be covered | |
+ | |||
Note: Health payer is not included into the consideration here, but this may need to be included within the business requirements at some point. | Note: Health payer is not included into the consideration here, but this may need to be included within the business requirements at some point. | ||
+ | |||
The WG reviewed the Add Provider R-MIM model, which seems to support the health service type through the HealthCare ProviderRoleType code. | The WG reviewed the Add Provider R-MIM model, which seems to support the health service type through the HealthCare ProviderRoleType code. | ||
+ | |||
ServiceDeliverLocation is covered in the Ade Provider R-MIM, but it was not clear if this satisfied the needs of this use case. | ServiceDeliverLocation is covered in the Ade Provider R-MIM, but it was not clear if this satisfied the needs of this use case. | ||
+ | |||
The WG clarified that in review of the model, we may need to update/expand the model based on the needs of this project. | The WG clarified that in review of the model, we may need to update/expand the model based on the needs of this project. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It seemed like a good approach to explicitely define the registries depicted in the use cases from Canada, to see if the concepts there are currently depicted in the registry topics within HL7 today. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Line 305: | Line 310: | ||
*. | *. | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
==Wednesday Q3== | ==Wednesday Q3== | ||
Line 328: | Line 332: | ||
<!-- ******** CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES *******************--> | <!-- ******** CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES *******************--> | ||
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | | width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | ||
− | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"| | + | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"| Irma Jongeneel |
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker''' | | width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker''' | ||
− | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"| | + | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"| Alex de Leon |
|- | |- | ||
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | | border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
Line 353: | Line 357: | ||
| . || Alex de Leon | | . || Alex de Leon | ||
|colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | |colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || . | | . || . | ||
Line 390: | Line 373: | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + 2 members): '''<Yes/No>''' | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + 2 members): '''<Yes/No>''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
<!---======================================================= | <!---======================================================= | ||
| | | | | | ||
Line 423: | Line 407: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | # . | + | 1. The WG did not have quorum, so was not able to approve the Cambridge minutes. |
− | # . | + | |
+ | 2. The WG worked on the Agenda: | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Patient Administration work group meeting, May 2011, Orlando''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Day''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Time''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Icon''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Event''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Chair''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Scribe''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Room''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | Monday | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | May 16 | ||
+ | |rowspan="2" align="middle" |AM | ||
+ | ||Q1||[[Image:Business_med.gif |24px]]| | ||
+ | |Welcome/introductions<br/> | ||
+ | * Approve agenda<br/> | ||
+ | * Review [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/pafm/overview.cfm PA mission & charter]<br/> | ||
+ | * Review [http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/pafm/20101004_PA_DMPv3_approved.doc PA decision making practice] | ||
+ | * Review [http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/pafm/2010-10-07_PA_WGM_Work_Plan.xls PA 3-year work plan] | ||
+ | ||Chair||Scribe|| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q2||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||''V3 Work – Regarding GS1 taskforce on patient identifiers (hosted by Patient Safety)''||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" align="middle" |PM | ||
+ | ||Q3||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation ||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q4||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation ||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |-border="4" cellpadding="8" style="background:#f0f0f0;" | ||
+ | |. ||||||||||||||||| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | Tuesday | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | May 17 | ||
+ | |rowspan="2" align="middle" |AM | ||
+ | ||Q1||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||''V3 Work - Encounter (hosted by Patient Care)''||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q2||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation ||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" align="middle" |PM | ||
+ | ||Q3||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||Interdependent Registries||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q4||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||Interdependent Registries||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |-border="4" cellpadding="8" style="background:#f0f0f0;" | ||
+ | |. ||||||||||||||||| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | Wednesday | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | May 18 | ||
+ | |rowspan="2" align="middle" |AM | ||
+ | ||Q1||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V2.8 - New proposals||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q2||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 - Scheduling domain||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" align="middle" |PM | ||
+ | ||Q3||[[Image:Business_med.gif |24px]]||Approve [http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/pafm/minutes/2010-10_PA_WGM_Minutes_Cambridge.pdf Cambridge minutes]<br/>Plan next meeting<br/>V3 Work - Harmonization proposals||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q4||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 Harmonization proposals||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |-border="4" cellpadding="8" style="background:#f0f0f0;" | ||
+ | |. ||||||||||||||||| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | Thursday | ||
+ | |rowspan="4" | May 19 | ||
+ | |rowspan="2" align="middle" |AM | ||
+ | ||Q1||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||''V3 Work - Interdependent Registries (hosted by SOA)''||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q2||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||''V3 Work - Interdependent Registries (hosted by SOA)''||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" align="middle" |PM | ||
+ | ||Q3||[[Image:Technical_med.gif|24px]]||V3 Work - Interdependent Registries||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Q4||[[Image:Business_med.gif |24px]]||Wrap up<br/>* Approve next ballot<br/>* Update work plan||Chair||Scribe||. | ||
+ | |-border="4" cellpadding="8" style="background:#f0f0f0;" | ||
+ | |. ||||||||||||||||| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Icons: | ||
+ | *Work Group business meeting [[Image:Business_med.gif |24px]] | ||
+ | *Ballot Reconciliation meeting [[Image:Reconciliation_med.gif |24px]] | ||
+ | *Work Group technical discussion [[Image:Technical_med.gif |24px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. There were no proposals identified for the WG to address | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Line 455: | Line 528: | ||
*. | *. | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
==Wednesday Q4== | ==Wednesday Q4== | ||
Line 503: | Line 575: | ||
| . || Alex de Leon | | . || Alex de Leon | ||
|colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | |colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Wendy Huang | | . || Wendy Huang | ||
|colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | |colspan="2"| Canada Infoway | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| . || Rene Spronk | | . || Rene Spronk | ||
Line 538: | Line 595: | ||
|- | |- | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and change quorum requirements ON NEXT LINE *****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and change quorum requirements ON NEXT LINE *****--> | ||
− | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + 2 members): ''' | + | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + 2 members): '''Yes''' |
|} | |} | ||
<!---======================================================= | <!---======================================================= | ||
Line 553: | Line 610: | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and fill in agenda items ON NEXT LINES ****--> | ||
+ | # Approve Cambridge minutes. | ||
# V3 Harmonization proposals | # V3 Harmonization proposals | ||
+ | # Continue clarification of encounter items | ||
'''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | '''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | ||
<!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | <!-- ***** Delete instructions and add document names/links ON NEXT LINES *****--> | ||
− | * | + | *[[PA_Patient_Encounter|http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=PA_Patient_Encounter]] |
+ | *[[Three PC-PA_Harmonization_issues|http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Three_PC/PA_harmonization_issues]] | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Line 571: | Line 631: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | + | 1. Having acheived quorum, | |
− | + | ||
+ | '''Motion (Rene/Alex):''' To approve the minutes from the September 2010 WGM in Cambridge Massachusetts | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Discussion:'''None | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Vote:''' 2/0/0 (for/against/abstain) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. There were no new harmonization proposals to consider. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. The WG continued to address and clarify the encounter-related items and the wikis for the various items were added to the PA Encounter Model wiki (Proposals from implementers): | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Proposal: update Find Encounters Query - part 2 - added 20110112, accepted with mods by PA 2011-01 WGM (Monday Q4) | ||
+ | *Add Ward/Bed/Room to ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType - added 20110112, accepted at conf call at 2009 07 15, accepted for a future release | ||
+ | *Harmonization Proposal: add three concepts to ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType - associated harmonization proposal | ||
+ | *Proposal: add Find Appointments Query - accepted by PA 20100120, part of harmonization process of Scheduling and Encounter model | ||
+ | |||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" |
Latest revision as of 21:14, 20 January 2012
Patient Administration Meeting - Wednesday January 12, 2011
Wednesday Q1
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room 2.08 |
Date: 2011-01-12 Time: Wednesday Q1 | ||
Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
. | Irma Jongeneel | NICTIZ | |
. | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
. | Sasha Bojicic | Canada Infoway | |
. | Ron Parker | Canada Infoway | |
. | Rene Spronk | HL7 Netherlands | |
. | Corinne Gower | HL7 New Zealand | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): <Yes/No> |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 Work - Interdependent Registries
Supporting Documents
<<insert slide deck here>>
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Sasha and Ron from Canada Infoway presented a slide deck for Interdependent Registries and reviewed the significant investments being made and support being received in the Canadian realm. This slide deck covered these subjects:
- What is the role of the registry
- EHRS Registry Types
- Why Interdependent Registries
- Concept of Identity Management vs Registry
- Examples of Interdependent
They discussed the anticipated set of registry components to manage information of the key business entities that define the process of health care delivery.
Initially, four registries were introduced Client, Provider, Location, Terminology later, the following is the final set of registries within Blueprint for 2015:
- Client
- Organization
- Provider
- Application
- Location
- User
- Health Service
- Health program
- Relationship Management Services
The Person registry has been deliberately left out due to the problems with where this might be relegated.
The WG discussed the concept of location and the various definitions based on context (patient location, provider service location, specialty location). This underscored the need to socialize these concepts to the larger PA audience so that they may examine the various registries to define appropriate use cases, examples, etc.
Canada Infoway is putting forth that the following are needed to move forward:
- Service Interfaces
- Data Elements
- HL7 Ineraction messages
The WG put forth that requirements would be needed to support these items. Canada Infoway is prepared to develop use cases to help define the requirements.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q2
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room 2.08 |
Date: 2011-01-12 Time: Wednesday Q2 | ||
Facilitator | <faciliator> | Note taker | <scribe> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
. | Irma Jongeneel | NICTIZ | |
. | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
. | Sasha Bojicic | Canada Infoway | |
. | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
. | Morten Myhre | Helse Vest IKT Norway | |
. | Ron Parker | Canada Infoway | |
. | Rene Spronk | HL7 Netherlands | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): <Yes/No> |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V3 - Interdependent Registries
Supporting Documents
- .
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
1. The WG discussed the goal for PA regarding interdependent registries. We should have fairly well defined requirements for interdependent registries for inclusion into the next ballot cycle.
2. The WG then continued with the use cases for interdependent registries from Canada Infoway.
Within the discussions, the WG considered some interdependency business requirements that arose as a result of the review of the eReferral use cases from Canada:
- Health Service Type – This may be covered in provider
- Provider – This information is most likely covered in the Provider Registry Topic
- Location – This needed information may be covered in the Service Delivery Location Topic
- Organization – This information may be covered
Note: Health payer is not included into the consideration here, but this may need to be included within the business requirements at some point.
The WG reviewed the Add Provider R-MIM model, which seems to support the health service type through the HealthCare ProviderRoleType code.
ServiceDeliverLocation is covered in the Ade Provider R-MIM, but it was not clear if this satisfied the needs of this use case.
The WG clarified that in review of the model, we may need to update/expand the model based on the needs of this project.
It seemed like a good approach to explicitely define the registries depicted in the use cases from Canada, to see if the concepts there are currently depicted in the registry topics within HL7 today.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room 2.08 |
Date: 2011-01-12 Time: Wednesday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
. | Irma Jongeneel | NICTIZ | |
. | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): <Yes/No> |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Approve Cambridge minutes
- Plan next meeting
- V3 Work - Harmonization proposals
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
1. The WG did not have quorum, so was not able to approve the Cambridge minutes.
2. The WG worked on the Agenda:
Patient Administration work group meeting, May 2011, Orlando
Day | Date | ' | Time | Icon | Event | Chair | Scribe | Room |
Monday | May 16 | AM | Q1 | | | Welcome/introductions
|
Chair | Scribe | |
Q2 | V3 Work – Regarding GS1 taskforce on patient identifiers (hosted by Patient Safety) | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
PM | Q3 | V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation | Chair | Scribe | . | |||
Q4 | V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
. | ||||||||
Tuesday | May 17 | AM | Q1 | V3 Work - Encounter (hosted by Patient Care) | Chair | Scribe | . | |
Q2 | V3 Work - Encounter ballot reconciliation | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
PM | Q3 | Interdependent Registries | Chair | Scribe | . | |||
Q4 | Interdependent Registries | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
. | ||||||||
Wednesday | May 18 | AM | Q1 | V2.8 - New proposals | Chair | Scribe | . | |
Q2 | V3 - Scheduling domain | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
PM | Q3 | Approve Cambridge minutes Plan next meeting V3 Work - Harmonization proposals |
Chair | Scribe | . | |||
Q4 | V3 Harmonization proposals | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
. | ||||||||
Thursday | May 19 | AM | Q1 | V3 Work - Interdependent Registries (hosted by SOA) | Chair | Scribe | . | |
Q2 | V3 Work - Interdependent Registries (hosted by SOA) | Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
PM | Q3 | V3 Work - Interdependent Registries | Chair | Scribe | . | |||
Q4 | Wrap up * Approve next ballot * Update work plan |
Chair | Scribe | . | ||||
. |
Icons:
3. There were no proposals identified for the WG to address
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room 2.08 |
Date: 2011-01-12 Time: Wednesday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | <facilitator> | Note taker | <scribe> |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
. | Irma Jongeneel | NICTIZ | |
. | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
. | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
. | Rene Spronk | HL7 Netherlands | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Approve Cambridge minutes.
- V3 Harmonization proposals
- Continue clarification of encounter items
Supporting Documents
- http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=PA_Patient_Encounter
- http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Three_PC/PA_harmonization_issues
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
1. Having acheived quorum,
Motion (Rene/Alex): To approve the minutes from the September 2010 WGM in Cambridge Massachusetts
Discussion:None
Vote: 2/0/0 (for/against/abstain)
2. There were no new harmonization proposals to consider.
3. The WG continued to address and clarify the encounter-related items and the wikis for the various items were added to the PA Encounter Model wiki (Proposals from implementers):
- Proposal: update Find Encounters Query - part 2 - added 20110112, accepted with mods by PA 2011-01 WGM (Monday Q4)
- Add Ward/Bed/Room to ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType - added 20110112, accepted at conf call at 2009 07 15, accepted for a future release
- Harmonization Proposal: add three concepts to ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType - associated harmonization proposal
- Proposal: add Find Appointments Query - accepted by PA 20100120, part of harmonization process of Scheduling and Encounter model
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2011 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.