This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-024 seperatableInd"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| − | + | 20 April 2006 | |
| − | * | + | *Meeting lost quorum, however the following was discussed: |
| + | **Friendly amendment that the attribute should also be added to the 2 ‘precondition’ act relationships | ||
| + | **amendment accepted by Charlie | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
Motion (First, second): Motion | Motion (First, second): Motion | ||
Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z | Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Charlie Bishop | Revision date: ? |
| Submitted date: 08 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-024 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Issue
Need to be able to indicate that a clinical statement is not intended to be interpreted independently of a related reference range or condition.
Recommendation
Add seperatableInd to Observation.referenceRange and ActChoice.conditions with cardinality [1..1] and conformance Mandatory.
Rationale
If it is not possible to state that the target should not be separated from the source, then the recipient will not be aware that the sender did not intend this to happen.
Discussion
20 April 2006
- Meeting lost quorum, however the following was discussed:
- Friendly amendment that the attribute should also be added to the 2 ‘precondition’ act relationships
- amendment accepted by Charlie
Resolution
Motion (First, second): Motion Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z
