This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "PIC:COCHAIRS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Requirements:) |
|||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
#* Committee Comments: leave blank | #* Committee Comments: leave blank | ||
#* Status: Added to updated document | #* Status: Added to updated document | ||
+ | # Clarify requirement for posting consolidated reconciliation spreadsheet to Ballot Desktop. See sections 4.5.1 Consolidating Comment Spreadsheets and 4.4.3 Normative Ballots. There should be a persistent copy available before the WGM, and incremental update copies available to WG members (or ballot concensus group). Should this be done consistently by all WGs or leave each WG to define their own process? This came up in OO WG because members wanted copy of versions being emailed between co-chairs and not visible to partiicpants. | ||
+ | #* Source: Freida Hall | ||
+ | #* Submitted on: 2014-09-23 | ||
+ | #* Committee Comments: leave blank | ||
+ | #* Status: Entered |
Revision as of 14:34, 23 September 2014
Return to the >> Process Improvement Committee
Contents
Co-Chair Handbook Template Maintenance Project
Project Information
- Insert project description here
- The Project Scope Statement status is: approved by PIC 2010-06-10, approved by T3SD 2010-08-16
Project Lead(s)
- Sandy Stuart (sandra.stuart@kp.org)
Project Timeline
- Project Launch: December 2013
- Gather Requirements: Ongoing
- Update Handbook: Jan - April 2014
- Approval: September 2014
- Release/Publication: May 2014 WGM
Project Working Documents
- Co-Chair Handbook DRAFT following May 2014 WGM - Last update May 2014
Project Requirements Gathering
Instructions:
To add a requirement for consideration by the committee edit the WIKI directly yourself following the template provided or email the PIC List Service (pic@lists.hl7.org)
- Requirement Template:
- enter requirement
- Source: enter your name and email address
- Submitted on: enter the date of your submission
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Entered
Requirements:
- Review handbook for references to the GOM as we've now split the HL7 Essential Requirements off from that document
- Source: Karen Van Hentenryck
- Submitted on: 01.14.2012
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Added to updated document
- Update statement re: WGM minutes - must be posted in two week as TSC will be adding Work Group Health metric. Existing text: "6) Your meeting minutes need to be posted as defined in the Decision Making Practices document." Change to: "6) Your WGM meeting minutes need to be posted in two weeks following the WGM." This is consistent with section 3.14.2. May want to add statement re: conference call minutes due date consitent with DMP.
- Source: Freida Hall/TSC
- Submitted on: 2014-01-18
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Added to updated document
- Update Work Group Health, section 3.3, to indicate where to find the approal reqirements for DMP, SWOT, and M&C, e.g. what has to be approved by WG/SD/TSC. In following sentence add text at end after 'Cards': The following TSC wiki page includes the details on what is measured in the Work Group Health Report Cards, and includes approval requirement for the Work Group Mission and Charter (M&C), Decision Making Practices (DMP), and Strength/Weakness/Opportunity/Threat (SWOT) analysis.
- Source: Freida Hall
- Submitted on: 2014-05-05
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Entered
- Consider adding reference to wiki instructions on how to reconcile ballots at: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Reconciliation_HowTo
- Source: Freida Hall
- Submitted on: 2014-07-18
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Added to updated document
- Clarify requirement for posting consolidated reconciliation spreadsheet to Ballot Desktop. See sections 4.5.1 Consolidating Comment Spreadsheets and 4.4.3 Normative Ballots. There should be a persistent copy available before the WGM, and incremental update copies available to WG members (or ballot concensus group). Should this be done consistently by all WGs or leave each WG to define their own process? This came up in OO WG because members wanted copy of versions being emailed between co-chairs and not visible to partiicpants.
- Source: Freida Hall
- Submitted on: 2014-09-23
- Committee Comments: leave blank
- Status: Entered