This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 05, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
! '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' | ! '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' || || '''Member Name''' !! '''Present''' | ||
|-. | |-. | ||
| − | | [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair ||x|||| [mailto:john.moehrke@med.ge.com John Moehrke] Security Co-chair || | + | | [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair ||x|| |
| + | || [mailto:john.moehrke@med.ge.com John Moehrke] Security Co-chair || | ||
| + | || || [mailto:trish.williams@ecu.edu.au Trish Williams] Security Co-chair || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [mailto:bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de Bernd Blobel], Security Co-chair || || ||||.|| || ||. | + | | [mailto:bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de Bernd Blobel], Security Co-chair ||. || ||||.|| || ||. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] ||x|| || [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] ||x || || [mailto:duane.decouteau@gmail.com Duane DeCouteau] || | + | | [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] ||x |
| + | || | ||
| + | || [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] ||x | ||
| + | || || [mailto:duane.decouteau@gmail.com Duane DeCouteau] || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |[mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer] || || ||[mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair ||x || || [mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker] ||x | + | |[mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer] || |
| + | || ||[mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair ||x | ||
| + | || || [mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker] ||x | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Muhammed Jafari] || | + | | [mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Muhammed Jafari] || |
| + | || || [mailto:djorgenson@inpriva.com Don Jorgenson] || | ||
| + | || || [mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga] ||x | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [mailto:Harry.Rhodes@AHIMA.org Harry Rhodes] || || || [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] || | + | | [mailto:Harry.Rhodes@AHIMA.org Harry Rhodes] || |
| + | || || [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] || | ||
| + | || || [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com David Staggs] || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair || || || [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] ||x || || [mailto:Scott.Weinstein@hhs.gov Scott Weinstein] || | + | | [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair || |
| + | || || [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] ||x | ||
| + | || || [mailto:Scott.Weinstein@hhs.gov Scott Weinstein] || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| || || || . || || || . || | | || || || . || || || . || | ||
| Line 30: | Line 43: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | #''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | ||
| + | # '''New Harmonization Proposal''' - Kathleen | ||
| + | #''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments''' Security and Privacy Ontology | #''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments''' Security and Privacy Ontology | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''NIB submittal''' | #''(15 min)'' '''NIB submittal''' | ||
| − | #''(10 min)'' '''Other Business''' | + | #''(10 min)'' '''Other Business''' |
==Meeting Minutes== | ==Meeting Minutes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''New Harmonization Proposal''' - Kathleen | ||
| + | (accepted by the review) | ||
| + | * TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations | ||
| + | * TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations | ||
| + | ** Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group) | ||
| + | ***there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO | ||
| + | |||
| + | What will it mean to support more than one value? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' '''TOPIC DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION''' '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote''' HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments) | ||
| + | HCS Ballot Reconciliation comment resolutions / negative comments reviewed: | ||
| + | * line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded, so no response ''required''), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation | ||
| + | * line 37 (comment 34) - not persuasive | ||
| + | * line 38 (comment 35) - not persuasive | ||
| + | * line 39 (comment 36) - not persuasive (handling caveats not complete) | ||
| + | * line 40 (comment 37) | ||
| + | * line 41 (comment 38) | ||
| + | * line 42 (comment 39) | ||
| + | --end of Dr. Stumpf’s comments | ||
| + | * line 43 - | ||
| + | * line 44 - | ||
| + | * line 45 – | ||
| + | ---end of Clem McDonald's comments | ||
| + | Mike expressed concern that the comment disposition resolution responses provided on the ballot comments would allow for the passing of the ballot? Kathleen: <<yes>> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notes: no further comments returned from Alan Hobbs or Walter Suarez | ||
| + | Motion made by Kathleen to accept the HCS comment disposition resolutions as presented and amended per discussion. Brian : Second; no further discussion | ||
| + | '''VOTE: Objections: none / Abstentions: none / Motion: Passes (6)''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Remaining agenda items will be moved forward to next week's meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | Meeting adjourned: 14:58 | ||
| + | Add to next week: LOINC clinical background ontology which discusses (use of S&P,RBAC ontologies, etc.) use of common terminology as required for conformance systems (Tony to provide background) | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] 00:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:01, 6 November 2013
Attendees
| Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Davis Security Co-chair | x | John Moehrke Security Co-chair | Trish Williams Security Co-chair | ||||
| Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair | . | . | . | ||||
| Johnathan Coleman | x | Kathleen Connor | x | Duane DeCouteau | |||
| Reed Gelzer | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair | x | Brian Handspicker | x | |||
| Muhammed Jafari | Don Jorgenson | Diana Proud-Madruga | x | ||||
| Harry Rhodes | Ioana Singureanu | David Staggs | |||||
| Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair | Tony Weida | x | Scott Weinstein | ||||
| . | . |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation Comments Security and Privacy Ontology
- (15 min) NIB submittal
- (10 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
New Harmonization Proposal - Kathleen (accepted by the review)
- TPO - for a legacy system; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of healthcare treatment, payment or provider operations
- TO - treatment and operations to satisfy where a patient paid for their services and did not want the information relayed to the payer; to perform one or more operations on information by a healthcare provider for provision of health care treatment or provider operations
- Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
- there is no reason why policy cannot be interpreted to include TPO
- Mike, John have reservations on this proposal (previous concepts/code are 'singular,' and this may appear to have joining multiple codes in a convenient or arbitrary combination/set/group)
What will it mean to support more than one value?
Purpose of the code is to define the policy the decision is to be made in
TOPIC DEFERRED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
Ballot Reconciliation Comments/Vote HCS (Dr. Stumpf and Clem's comments) HCS Ballot Reconciliation comment resolutions / negative comments reviewed:
- line 36 - (Dr. Stumpf) similar to Clem's. (No vote recorded, so no response required), response shortened to two sentences per recommendation
- line 37 (comment 34) - not persuasive
- line 38 (comment 35) - not persuasive
- line 39 (comment 36) - not persuasive (handling caveats not complete)
- line 40 (comment 37)
- line 41 (comment 38)
- line 42 (comment 39)
--end of Dr. Stumpf’s comments
- line 43 -
- line 44 -
- line 45 –
---end of Clem McDonald's comments Mike expressed concern that the comment disposition resolution responses provided on the ballot comments would allow for the passing of the ballot? Kathleen: <<yes>>
Notes: no further comments returned from Alan Hobbs or Walter Suarez Motion made by Kathleen to accept the HCS comment disposition resolutions as presented and amended per discussion. Brian : Second; no further discussion VOTE: Objections: none / Abstentions: none / Motion: Passes (6)
Remaining agenda items will be moved forward to next week's meeting
Meeting adjourned: 14:58 Add to next week: LOINC clinical background ontology which discusses (use of S&P,RBAC ontologies, etc.) use of common terminology as required for conformance systems (Tony to provide background)
--Suzannegw 00:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
