This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "October 22, 2013 CBCC Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
John is out-of-office, then on vacation; will postpone ballot reconciliation until next week in hopes that John will be available then. | John is out-of-office, then on vacation; will postpone ballot reconciliation until next week in hopes that John will be available then. | ||
| − | Brian | + | Richard would like to continue the value-set vocabulary (Juvenile Health, Child |
| − | + | ||
| + | We have had broader support in the staff in the commnity that constitue the support of the client (i.e. peer support specialist, Al-anon sponser, avaialbe, but not always required for transition of care, etc) These may be the beginnings of a new use case, but its also a way of thinking of the multiples services that servie a single client as ''part of the care-management team'' which makes good sense for this particular type of client | ||
| + | * case management for familes/children/student you may want to tap into the NIEM '''CYFS''' (children-youth-family-services in the NIEM realm) it is a specific domain schema. May be P20W, post educational...something...to allow flow of high school transcripts to colleges | ||
| + | <<20:18>> | ||
| + | * ACION ITEEM: Brian will send the education related standards to the CBCC list | ||
| + | P20W Education Standards council PESK "post secondary to PHD '20' | ||
| + | * Wende; we have a discussion on required fields and if they were consistent with standards, there was concerned expressed about that among attendees to the call | ||
| + | ** one concern; addressed; which are required and which are not. In the BH model were option | ||
| + | ** If something is required, we don't want the BH providers to be the odd duck--but be consistent and supported in the standard. if some of the states are not supporting some of the elements, we need to mark them as mandatory as they are relevant to meaningful use as good guidance for vendors (especially between the states); we have recognized this in the DAM--we've lowered the bar. if we are trying to document the requirements across states and include the federal guidance development, we sould inform the states and vendors they need to add suppport for these elements. It makes sense in the BH DAM to say--you should support these items otherwise you won't be able to support CDA documents. | ||
| + | ** there are a subset of data that you ''MUST'' have otherwise you will not have interoperability | ||
| + | |||
| + | * minimum core set for criminal justice (for delivery of care) and BH and where where peoples needs need to be met; identify core data fo | ||
| + | |||
ACTION ITEMS: | ACTION ITEMS: | ||
| − | + | Wende to contact Ioana on a follow up vendor meeting | |
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 22 October 2013
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
- Yes - Wende Baker
- Bill Braithwaite, MD
- Kathleen Connor
- Daniel Crough
- Yes - Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Mohammed Jafari
- MaryAnn Juurlink
- Yes - Brian Handspicker
- Yes - Steve Eichner
- Michael Alonso
- Jim Kretz
- Tracy Leeper
- Lisa Nelson
- Mike Lardiere
- Yes - Diana Proud-Madruga
- Yes - Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Ken Salyards
- Yes - Ioana Singureanu
- Kate Wetherby
- Tony Weida
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation - Ioana
- (15 min) Review of work defining sensitivity value set
- (5 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Ballot reconciliation requires face-to-face with John Moehrke. John is out-of-office, then on vacation; will postpone ballot reconciliation until next week in hopes that John will be available then.
Richard would like to continue the value-set vocabulary (Juvenile Health, Child
We have had broader support in the staff in the commnity that constitue the support of the client (i.e. peer support specialist, Al-anon sponser, avaialbe, but not always required for transition of care, etc) These may be the beginnings of a new use case, but its also a way of thinking of the multiples services that servie a single client as part of the care-management team which makes good sense for this particular type of client
- case management for familes/children/student you may want to tap into the NIEM CYFS (children-youth-family-services in the NIEM realm) it is a specific domain schema. May be P20W, post educational...something...to allow flow of high school transcripts to colleges
<<20:18>>
- ACION ITEEM: Brian will send the education related standards to the CBCC list
P20W Education Standards council PESK "post secondary to PHD '20'
- Wende; we have a discussion on required fields and if they were consistent with standards, there was concerned expressed about that among attendees to the call
- one concern; addressed; which are required and which are not. In the BH model were option
- If something is required, we don't want the BH providers to be the odd duck--but be consistent and supported in the standard. if some of the states are not supporting some of the elements, we need to mark them as mandatory as they are relevant to meaningful use as good guidance for vendors (especially between the states); we have recognized this in the DAM--we've lowered the bar. if we are trying to document the requirements across states and include the federal guidance development, we sould inform the states and vendors they need to add suppport for these elements. It makes sense in the BH DAM to say--you should support these items otherwise you won't be able to support CDA documents.
- there are a subset of data that you MUST have otherwise you will not have interoperability
- minimum core set for criminal justice (for delivery of care) and BH and where where peoples needs need to be met; identify core data fo
ACTION ITEMS:
Wende to contact Ioana on a follow up vendor meeting
