This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20131008 FGB concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
 
*Approve minutes of [[20130922 FGB WGM]]
 
*Approve minutes of [[20130922 FGB WGM]]
 
*Action Item review:  
 
*Action Item review:  
**FGB should put something together for elevator pitch and John puts it into his CTO report to the Board
+
**FMG & FGB to each discuss term staggering
 
**Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
 
**Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
 
**Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
 
**Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)

Revision as of 12:06, 8 October 2013

HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 334-756-981

Date: 2013-10-08
Time: 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ron Parker Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Quorum = Chair plus 2 yes/no
Chair/CTO Members Members
Ron Parker George (Woody) Beeler Ewout Kramer
John Quinn Grahame Grieve
observers/guests Austin Kreisler
Lynn Laakso, scribe

Agenda

  • Roll call -
  • Agenda Review
  • Approve minutes of 20130922 FGB WGM
  • Action Item review:
    • FMG & FGB to each discuss term staggering
    • Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
    • Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
    • Ron will address immediate need for "BAM-lite" with ArB.
    • Ron will follow up with John to establish a protocol for FGB chair representation in external stakeholder relationships wrt FHIR.
  • FMG update -
  • Methodology update-
  • Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
    • FGB composition to support DSTU adoption customer base
    • Extract policy assertions and decision criteria from management decisions related to connectathon registration
    • criteria for seeking policy assertions,
    • escalation points on risk items triggering governance action


Minutes

Convened at

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


Back to FHIR_Governance_Board

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.