This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20130715 FMG concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes''' <br/> '''Location: call 770-657-...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
−
|colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| Quorum = N/A
 
−
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''N/A'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Co chairs||regrets ||Hugh Glover|| ||Lloyd McKenzie
+
|X||Lloyd McKenzie ||X||Brian Pech ||X||Dave Hamill
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ex-officio|| ||Ron Parker, FGB Chair||.||John Quinn, CTO
+
|X||David Pyke ||X||Saurabh ||X||Teresa Conway
−
|}
 
−
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
 
−
|-
 
−
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests
 
−
|-
 
−
|X||Lorraine Constable ||X||John Moehrke ||regrets ||Lynn Laakso, scribe
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||Jean Duteau  || ||Brian Pech  || || Austin Kreisler
+
|X||Akos Nsiah-Yeboah ||X||Mike Henderson ||X||Dennis Cheung
 
|-
 
|-
−
|X||David Hay|||| ||X|| Dave Hamill
+
|X||John Quinn||X||Ebere ||X||Natalya
 
|-
 
|-
 
| . || ||||  ||  ||  
 
| . || ||||  ||  ||  
Line 31: Line 23:
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
−
*Roll Call
+
*Planning QA of FHIR for the upcoming ballot
−
*Agenda Check
 
−
*Minutes from [[20130703_FMG_concall]] , [[20130626 FMG concall]]
 
−
*Administrative
 
−
** Action items
 
−
***  FMG normalized concept in T3SD vs FTSD and a narrative definition clarifying scope vs. other WGs.
 
−
*Reports
 
−
**Connectathon management (David/Brian)
 
−
**[[FHIR Governance Board|FGB]]
 
−
***FGB passed a motion:
 
−
***:Where a resource cannot be evolved and its definition developed between WGMs and the sponsoring WG cannot make progress, then the FMG can determine the resource responsibility must be assigned to the Core Team. That assignment can be appealed to the FGB for consideration.
 
−
***[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7321/10412/VitalityAssessment101March2013.pptx Vitality Assessment model] - coming up with metrics
 
−
**MnM –
 
−
**[[FMG Liaisons]] –
 
−
*Process management
 
−
**Ballot Planning
 
−
***[[:Category:FHIR_Resource_Proposal|FHIR resource proposals]] writeup status and review status
 
−
***Ballot readiness and QA call scheduling
 
−
***Scope boundaries discussion continued
 
−
**Ballot content review and QA process [[FHIR QA Guidelines]]
 
−
*AOB (Any Other Business)
 
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
−
*David Hay motioned to adjourn based on the fact that quorum was not met.
+
*Although we recorded the GoToMeeting, there is no audio since we used the HL7 dial-in.
−
*Both Lorraine and John 2nded.  Meeting adjourned
+
 
 +
*Objective of the QA work:  To get as much ready as possible for ballot.
 +
 
 +
*What is FHIR? 
 +
**FHIR is a next generation standard for HL7.  It leverages lessons learned from V3 messaging, CDA, V2, and tries to make us of more modern interface technologies in order to simplify development of standards and implement interfaces that utilize those standards.
 +
**FHIR uses re-usable ‘items' called resources.  FHIR has gone through 2 ballot cycles and 1 formal QA cycles.  Both the ballots were Draft for Comment.  The upcoming ballot is the first non-comment cycle.  It’ll be DSTU.  We expect the DSTU to be open for 3 years before attempting to take FHIR normative.
 +
 
 +
*Our primary objective to get depth and breadth of the implementation experience. 
 +
 
 +
*At the last QA meeting, each QA person was to view just view their specific area.  This time each review is going to be given a set of sections in the ballot.  These are listed in the left hand side of the FHIR page (v0.09).  Assignment will simply be in alpha order. On average each person will be assigned 9 resources.
 +
 
 +
*Any substantive feedback needs to occur during the actual ballot.  The pre-ballot QA review should be “Is the content at a level that can be appropriate balloted?”
 +
typos or incorrect hyperlinks can be pointed out.  Just don’t get too deep in the substantive issues.
 +
 
 +
*When you look at a resource, it will include text and a main picture.  Tabs across will provide links to examples, definitions, mappings and profiles.
 +
 
 +
*Prioritzation of QA review
 +
#First tab
 +
#Formal Definitions
 +
#Mappings
 +
#Examples (only need to look at either XML or the JSON; no need to review both)
 +
 
 +
*Target deadline to complete all reviews: Submit all content by Sunday, July 27.
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 61: Line 55:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
−
*  
+
*Lloyd – Send out the QA spreadsheets to the teammembers
  
 
|-
 
|-

Latest revision as of 19:15, 15 July 2013

HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/450662277

Date: 2013-07-15
Time: 1:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Chair: Lloyd Note taker(s): Dave Hamill
X Lloyd McKenzie X Brian Pech X Dave Hamill
X David Pyke X Saurabh X Teresa Conway
X Akos Nsiah-Yeboah X Mike Henderson X Dennis Cheung
X John Quinn X Ebere X Natalya
.

Agenda

  • Planning QA of FHIR for the upcoming ballot

Minutes

  • Although we recorded the GoToMeeting, there is no audio since we used the HL7 dial-in.
  • Objective of the QA work: To get as much ready as possible for ballot.
  • What is FHIR?
    • FHIR is a next generation standard for HL7. It leverages lessons learned from V3 messaging, CDA, V2, and tries to make us of more modern interface technologies in order to simplify development of standards and implement interfaces that utilize those standards.
    • FHIR uses re-usable ‘items' called resources. FHIR has gone through 2 ballot cycles and 1 formal QA cycles. Both the ballots were Draft for Comment. The upcoming ballot is the first non-comment cycle. It’ll be DSTU. We expect the DSTU to be open for 3 years before attempting to take FHIR normative.
  • Our primary objective to get depth and breadth of the implementation experience.
  • At the last QA meeting, each QA person was to view just view their specific area. This time each review is going to be given a set of sections in the ballot. These are listed in the left hand side of the FHIR page (v0.09). Assignment will simply be in alpha order. On average each person will be assigned 9 resources.
  • Any substantive feedback needs to occur during the actual ballot. The pre-ballot QA review should be “Is the content at a level that can be appropriate balloted?”

typos or incorrect hyperlinks can be pointed out. Just don’t get too deep in the substantive issues.

  • When you look at a resource, it will include text and a main picture. Tabs across will provide links to examples, definitions, mappings and profiles.
  • Prioritzation of QA review
  1. First tab
  2. Formal Definitions
  3. Mappings
  4. Examples (only need to look at either XML or the JSON; no need to review both)
  • Target deadline to complete all reviews: Submit all content by Sunday, July 27.

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Lloyd – Send out the QA spreadsheets to the teammembers
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

20130717 FMG concall


Back to FHIR_Management_Group

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=20130715_FMG_concall&oldid=76210"