This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FHIR observation Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{FHIR Discussion Page}} <!--Category:Active FHIR Discussion--> Welcome to "Observation Resource" discussion page. Please put any comments about this page here. Contents wil...") |
Jgoodnough (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FHIR Discussion Page}} | {{FHIR Discussion Page}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:Active FHIR Discussion]] | |
Welcome to "Observation Resource" discussion page. Please put any comments about this page here. Contents will be reviewed periodically. | Welcome to "Observation Resource" discussion page. Please put any comments about this page here. Contents will be reviewed periodically. | ||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
− | + | ||
+ | Q. Should "Range" be added to the list of allowed value types for a result? | ||
+ | |||
+ | E.g. valueRange would be used to represent "10-15" bacteria per high power field on a microscope slide. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Q. Should the ReferenceRange be extended to support the sane types and the values? | ||
+ | |||
+ | E.g. Should there be a high and low value Ratio - Take Blood pressure and expressed as a ratio, high might be 210/110 while low might be "100/60". |
Latest revision as of 23:49, 4 June 2013
Welcome to "Observation Resource" discussion page. Please put any comments about this page here. Contents will be reviewed periodically.
Discussion
Q. Should "Range" be added to the list of allowed value types for a result?
E.g. valueRange would be used to represent "10-15" bacteria per high power field on a microscope slide.
Q. Should the ReferenceRange be extended to support the sane types and the values?
E.g. Should there be a high and low value Ratio - Take Blood pressure and expressed as a ratio, high might be 210/110 while low might be "100/60".