This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "March 27, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6728/9221/MeaningfulUseStage2SecurityandPrivacyRequirements.pptx Meaningful Use Stage 2 Security Standards and Certification Criteria Review]''' Kathleen: HL7 Policy Committee would like Security and CBCC WG comments | #''(15 min)'' '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6728/9221/MeaningfulUseStage2SecurityandPrivacyRequirements.pptx Meaningful Use Stage 2 Security Standards and Certification Criteria Review]''' Kathleen: HL7 Policy Committee would like Security and CBCC WG comments | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6727/9220/HL7March2012HarmonizationSecurityVocabularyResults.pptx HL7 March Harmonization Security Vocabulary Results]''' Kathleen | #''(15 min)'' '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6727/9220/HL7March2012HarmonizationSecurityVocabularyResults.pptx HL7 March Harmonization Security Vocabulary Results]''' Kathleen | ||
− | #''(5 min)'' ''' | + | #''(5 min)'' '''FTSD meeting''' or 'Arguing the case of Normative Ontology. The results of that discussion would be a topic. |
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] | [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] |
Revision as of 17:04, 27 March 2012
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Kathleen Connor
- Ed Coyne
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Security and Privacy Ontology Tony
- (15 min) Meaningful Use Stage 2 Security Standards and Certification Criteria Review Kathleen: HL7 Policy Committee would like Security and CBCC WG comments
- (15 min) HL7 March Harmonization Security Vocabulary Results Kathleen
- (5 min) FTSD meeting or 'Arguing the case of Normative Ontology. The results of that discussion would be a topic.