This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "January 3, 2012 CBCC Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Created page with "=Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting= Back to CBCC Main Page ==[[Community-Based_Collaborative_Care| Meeting Informa...")
 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
 +
 +
* [mailto:ecoyned@drc.com Ed Coyne]
 +
* [mailto: Daniel Crough]
 +
* [mailto:jfarmer@apelon.com Jon Farmer]
 +
* [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair
 +
* [mailto: Madan Gopal]
 +
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
 +
* [mailto:serafina@eversolve.com Serafina Versaggi]
 +
 +
 +
'''[[Community-Based_Collaborative_Care|Back to CBCC Main Page]]'''
 +
  
 
==Agenda==  
 
==Agenda==  
Line 12: Line 24:
 
#''(45 min)'' '''Behavioral Health CCD'''  Discussion
 
#''(45 min)'' '''Behavioral Health CCD'''  Discussion
 
#''(10 min)'' San Antonio Working Group Meeting update
 
#''(10 min)'' San Antonio Working Group Meeting update
 +
 
==Meeting Minutes==  
 
==Meeting Minutes==  
 +
''' Roll Call & Accept Agenda'''
 +
 +
'''Behavioral Health CCD'''  Discussion
 +
* 61 people who have registered to vote
 +
** 4 affirmative (AZ-Sara Imhold, Kathleen Connor,Novartis/affirmative and one other)
 +
** 1 abstain (Mitre/abstain)
 +
** VA votes have not yet been posted
 +
 +
Behavior Health CCD-DAM-Draft.1.SV2.docx
 +
* NIEM?  I thought the only being discussed in the healthcare space oabout the niem was the process for producing the artifacs for reference implementations…we’re not talking about an information model .
 +
* On the criminal justice side/criminal side they are creating value sets
 +
* Putting the package likethe DAM and downto the value sets…as well.
 +
* Query health – must come of with sepcificiations there—fairly tight, so that they can collect meaningful nfomation.  Not sure how they propose to do that. But they also have to specifiy value sets as well,
 +
* We need to hit the highest and most important points and stops there for this ballot., then move to the next step/ballot (we are looking at the core points only at this time)
 +
* Focus on the attributes of the FHIM—BH domain (to include value sets)
 +
* We are not excluding anything—however we want people to know why items are considered part of the core.
 +
* Work plan needs to be in place. 
 +
** Off line calls (Jim, Serafina, Ioana,
 +
 +
 +
 +
'''CBCC Co-Chair Ballot'' - ''Reminder''
 +
** Absentee ballot: '''NLT January 11th NOON (Wednesday) send to [mailto:Nominations@HL7.org Nominations@HL7.org]
 +
#''(10 min)'' San Antonio Working Group Meeting update
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Community-Based_Collaborative_Care|Back to CBCC Main Page]]
 +
  
  
 
[[Community-Based_Collaborative_Care|Back to CBCC Main Page]]
 
[[Community-Based_Collaborative_Care|Back to CBCC Main Page]]

Revision as of 03:13, 3 February 2012

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Meeting Information

Attendees


Back to CBCC Main Page


Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call & Accept Agenda
  2. (45 min) Behavioral Health CCD Discussion
  3. (10 min) San Antonio Working Group Meeting update

Meeting Minutes

Roll Call & Accept Agenda

Behavioral Health CCD Discussion

  • 61 people who have registered to vote
    • 4 affirmative (AZ-Sara Imhold, Kathleen Connor,Novartis/affirmative and one other)
    • 1 abstain (Mitre/abstain)
    • VA votes have not yet been posted

Behavior Health CCD-DAM-Draft.1.SV2.docx

  • NIEM? I thought the only being discussed in the healthcare space oabout the niem was the process for producing the artifacs for reference implementations…we’re not talking about an information model .
  • On the criminal justice side/criminal side they are creating value sets
  • Putting the package likethe DAM and downto the value sets…as well.
  • Query health – must come of with sepcificiations there—fairly tight, so that they can collect meaningful nfomation. Not sure how they propose to do that. But they also have to specifiy value sets as well,
  • We need to hit the highest and most important points and stops there for this ballot., then move to the next step/ballot (we are looking at the core points only at this time)
  • Focus on the attributes of the FHIM—BH domain (to include value sets)
  • We are not excluding anything—however we want people to know why items are considered part of the core.
  • Work plan needs to be in place.
    • Off line calls (Jim, Serafina, Ioana,


'CBCC Co-Chair Ballot - Reminder

  1. (10 min) San Antonio Working Group Meeting update


Back to CBCC Main Page


Back to CBCC Main Page